23 May, 2012

Another Pack of Pucksters Makes Round 2 Picks

Dear Jim Iovino: Wise men publish elevated flattery directed at beautiful women.

Kinda surprised we were the only ones going with Caps in seven in round one. But we’re even more surprised to see the overwhelming majority (all but one!) of puck prognosticators over at NBCWashington.com go with the Caps in round two, against the no. 1-seeded Blueshirts. Folks just really seem to like this matchup for our guys. NBCWashington’s Iovino has again solicited the predictions of a stable of able local new media hockey nuts, and we enthusiastically contributed. The series preview is on the NBCWashington.com home page this morning.

A snippet from our overall take on the series:

Again with this fine collaborative, there are scores of strong insights, and the varied perspectives make for an enriching read. We won’t tell you here how we called round 2 for the Caps — visit NBCWashington.com for that — but we will share that we are seeing potentially something special form for the Caps this postseason. “Special hockey clubs in spring often seem to have a special chemistry between skaters and netminder, a bit of a swagger,” we wrote. “This Capitals club seems to have just that swagger.”

And we ID’d this as the series ‘X-Factor’:



Game Day: How the Capitals Approach Video Work

7 a.m., game day (regular season).

Washington Capitals video coach Blaine Forsythe is already at the rink, on a day that will consist of at least four meetings for his team as they prep for the evening’s opponent. The team’s coaching staff will use part of the morning to review game video together—a change head coach Dale Hunter implemented when he took over earlier in the season.  Under previous head coach Bruce Boudreau, the coaches would first watch video separately.

There are other, subtle differences between the two coaches’ video style, such as what they choose to watch in-game between periods.  But that comes into play later in the day. Right now, the team of Hunter, Forsythe, and assistant coaches Jim Johnson and Dean Evason will dissect the video, then hold the first of the day’s team meetings before the guys step on the ice for practice.

The first meeting targets the opposing team’s penalty kill and Capitals’ man-advantage. Studying this before practice, Forsythe explains, gives Hunter a chance to implement on ice any tweaks he wants to make to the team’s power play for that evening.

After practice comes the 5-on-5 meeting, with a “little pre-scout on the opposition,” Forsythe says. The third meeting will take place later at Verizon Center and focus on the opposing goalie—what tendencies the Capitals can expose and what they need to look out for. Finally, there’s a fourth meeting that addresses the opposition’s power play and the Capitals’ penalty kill.

Some of the knowledge imparted in these meetings has come from hours of preparation by guys like Forsythe watching game tape. Forsythe says he tries to watch their opponents’ previous three games, time permitting, as well as the Capitals’ last game against the upcoming opponent.

Bottom line: NHL—and AHL—coaches spend a lot of time with a video screen.

“They’re constantly watching video,” Capitals forward Jay Beagle said. “When you go in there, even just to talk to one of them, they’re all watching video, riding the bike, or doing something. They’re constantly watching video.”

 

Photo by Clyde Caplan, clydeorama.com

The Players

Since Hunter came in, Forsythe says, there’s been a stronger focus on video. And the players are catching on.

“The players are taking more responsibility between periods to maybe look at stuff on the video,” Forsythe says. “Since Dale’s been in, we’ve done a lot more video individually with the players in between periods—obviously still trying to give them their space so they can kind of prepare.”

There’s a willing pupil in Beagle.

“I’ve always liked to be able to watch myself, watch my mistakes,” he said. “The game’s happening so fast on the ice, that sometimes to watch video and to be able to sit there with either Blaine or Dean,  just to break it down from a higher level than ice level, it benefits you a lot … and to see that one or two feet out of position makes a huge difference.”

Beagle remembers one game against Tampa late in the season when he was playing against Hart nominee Steven Stamkos’ line, and he made a positional adjustment the coaches recommended based on the video (he couldn’t divulge the actual adjustment).

Beagle is just one of several guys on the team who takes advantage of the video component, according to Forsythe. Brooks Laich is probably the biggest video junkie, and Matt Hendricks likes to watch his shifts after every game.

Alex Ovechkin also makes time to watch video.

“Even Alex Ovechkin likes to watch video, mostly offensively to see what defensemen are doing against him maybe one-on-one or what goalies are taking away from him when he’s shooting,” Forsythe says.

For Beagle, video work is less about giving himself an edge over an opponent and more about bettering himself as a player and perfecting his game.

Some players, explained Beagle, prefer not to watch their mistakes over and over again, finding it better mentally to put the mistake aside and move on. Beagle indicated there’s a point at which a player can watch too much video, though he’s not hit that. He says he mainly just refers to it when it’s tweaking his habits, or if he’s struggling with a certain part of the system.

“I’ll watch, say, someone else do it—like, if, when I switch back to center, I’d watch how Brooksie did it,” Beagle said.

Beagle adds that it’s particularly helpful on special situations like faceoffs, down to details like the position of his hands on the hockey stick. And if he’s had a bad night on faceoffs, Coach Evason knows Beagle will come calling.

“Dean already knows that I’m gonna come and ask him,” Beagle says about reviewing video. “We can basically read off each other.”

During the games, though, Beagle won’t watch the video himself between periods unless a coach brings it to him.

The Game

During the game, Forsythe sits upstairs in the press box and is in constant communication with assistant coach Dean Evason on the bench.

“Basically everything,” Forsythe described what aspects of the game he talks to Evason about. Evason will then relay the information to Hunter.

Between periods, Forsythe will head downstairs.

“I’ll have the video available,” he says. “We usually look at scoring chances for and against, and then, obviously special teams. … And between the four of us—between, obviously Jimmy, Dale, and Dean and myself—if there’s something that’s kind of concerning us that we want to look at, we’ll do that at that time.”

Forsythe called the adjustment on video work from Boudreau to Hunter nothing major—“just a different way to look at the game.” Hunter is more about the game dynamic—chances for and against and how they’re developed. Boudreau liked to focus on the structure of the game—things like faceoffs that he could control—and to be a step ahead of the other team, changing and adjusting to keep ahead of the opponent’s coaching staff. Hunter is more of a match coach, Forsythe adds.

On the Road

Road games don’t necessarily mean a break from video, though the location may change. Occasionally, the Caps will have video sessions at the hotel room as HBO’s 24/7 series this season showed John Tortorella and the New York Rangers doing. Mostly, though, it’s still done at the rink.

In the AHL, Beagle says, he remembers coaches struggling to get game tapes on other teams. And it’s done under less auspicious circumstances. There, it’s two coaches reviewing video–on the buses the teams use for transportation.

The Science

When Forsythe watches video, he’s watching the systems, with players’ habits taking a secondary role. Not that he doesn’t notice them.

“I’ve been in the league I think now for seven years, so you have a pretty good idea of how guys play,” he says. “Guys like Eric Staal that do things a little different than a lot of other players. … The Islanders, we talked about the Tavares line and how they’re real good and they’re off the rush and stuff. So that stuff is pretty natural, it just kind of stands out when you’re watching the video. But the main focus is systems, and then the other stuff kind of follows from that.”

NHL video coaches may do a good job of flying under the radar, but it’s clear not much gets by them.



A Bottle, Bose, and Playoff Hockey

Here’s a picture from tonight’s Phoenix/Nashville game at Jobing.com Arena. Talk about feeding today’s youth some playoff hockey.

How old were you when you attended your first playoff hockey game?  That child most likely has you beat at 3 months old.

A tap of the stick on the ice to our desert correspondent, Richard.



Rebounding

Well, that was … frustrating.

Not sure what’s more embarrassing–that the Capitals couldn’t score on a two-man advantage or several power plays, or that the Rangers couldn’t manage to score with no one in net for the Caps during the final two minutes of the game. Since the Rangers actually won 3-1, we’ll give them the last laugh this time.

But what made the game so frustrating was that the Capitals broke the cardinal rule of playoff games, and particularly playing against one of the best goalies in the world: establishing screens and a strong net presence. And it’s a rule they knew going in.

Brooks Laich said it earlier this week–if Henrik Lundqvist sees it, he stops it. Ovi said it after the game: “He’s a pretty good goalie, he’s gonna see a shot, I think he’s gonna save it.” The Caps did not get nearly the kind of net presence, or screens, they’re going to need to beat the Rangers. Some of this credit goes to the Rangers’ defense–like the Capitals have done recently, the Rangers don’t allow many quality shots on goal. But some of it comes down to the Caps’ decisions to pass rather than get the shot on goal and generate second and third chances with rebounds and traffic.  The Capitals love to pass, almost to a fault. And that, against a disciplined team like New York, causes turnovers.

The good news for the Capitals is that their mistakes were decipherable. This was no Jaroslav Halak unsolvable puzzle (not that Lundqvist wasn’t stellar). The bad news was the mistakes were habits the Capitals fall into all too often.

Holtby, meanwhile, wasn’t at his sharpest and didn’t face many shots on goal. But the second and third goals he gave up were fairly point-blank shots, with virtually no help from his defense. However, when you have Lundqvist at the other end of the ice , those are saves that must be made. The second Rangers’ goal developed primarily because of a bad change by the Caps’ defense–a frustrating rookie mistake by non-rookies in the second round of the NHL playoffs.  Another setback was Alexander Semin’s two penalties. He’s grown significantly this year in cutting down on those and getting better with his defensive game, but his first penalty was particularly untimely, as it negated a Capitals’ power play.

Listening to the postgame interviews via the Caps’ website, the guys were frank about saying they needed to play better. And they’ve got some time for redemption. This is Game 1.  And, as both teams in this series could tell you, sometimes winning is more about how you rebound than how you start.



A Rare Elation To Savor

This morning, we know no Curse.

How often have we been able to say that?

To what extent does victory like last night’s serve as lasting balm over the scabs and scars from so many springs, that have marred and maimed our pysche so long? It was a game 7 stunner in an American sports mecca, and against the defending champs no less, and as such it does go a long way to redeeming the 2011-12 season, to be sure. But doesn’t it also do a good bit more – existentially, even? In the warming embers of valiant victory’s glow, we want to say we think so.

Still, the overarching tally is vulgar and tough — our guys are 3-7 in game 7s. But this morning we can think only of no. 3.

And besting the defending champs to earn it does magnify the feat. The Washington Capitals had never before done that — taken down a champ. George McPhee this spring talked about how in his evaluation of the Bruins he saw a club this season that actually seemed stronger than the Cup-winning one of a year ago. They got out of the gate slow — 3-7 in their first 10 — but then the Big Bs went gangster. On December 16 they swaggered into Philly and laid down a beatdown of the first order on the Flyers, 6-0, a humiliation that wasn’t anywhere near as close as the score indicated. By Christmas the Bs were 23-9-1 and looking very much like Repeat material. More gaudy, gratuitous good fortune for the sports fans of Beantown, seemingly.

But the Bs cooled off big time in the season’s second half. Injuries played a part. Still, Tim Thomas wasn’t far off his Vezina and Conn Smythe form of the spring before, Chara was Chara, the forward ranks were brimming with 20-goal scorers, they were well coached, and the roster overall looked ready for more durable spring battle.

This wasn’t an opponent these work-in-progress Capitals should have have welcomed in round one.

About the middle of the series the Capitals’ Mike Vogel, on intermission radio with John Walton, alluded to Capitals players collectively “buying in” to the strategic mandate Dale Hunter began crafting last fall. There was “complete buy-in,” Vogs said, and he was right. The Capitals of recent previous springs suffered from a style that was all too easy to suppress in postseason congestion, ferocity, and brutality, and most recently — last spring – from a failed attempt to evolve into something they seemingly were not. These Washington Capitals evolved alright, and they did so because of one man, one Legend, and his now — we can say it (and please join us in saying it, Mike Wise!) — heroic return to his hockey home.

What comes next for these Capitals we cannot know, but in an important sense it really doesn’t matter. Dale Hunter alone deserves credit for righting a seemingly hopelessly adrift ship, for reminding HockeyWashington of the way hockey should be played when it mattered. This is not to say that Braden Holtby is any less a series-altering hero; that John Carlson and Karl Alzner didn’t raise their respective games dramatically relative to the regular season; that Alex Semin shouldn’t be called out for coming through clutch when the team’s other stars weren’t shining as bright. But this stunning series triumph doesn’t happen without the Old Captain coming home and imposing his will on this roster, on this organization.

Watching Dale Hunter embrace his assistants on the bench in the immediacy of victory last night, you couldn’t help but wonder: how in relation to that other game 7 stunner, of 1988, did this match up for him?

Another newcomer made last night historically memorable — John Walton. The hunch here is that by virtue of his extraordinary rookie NHL season — one that eanred him lead moonlighting duty on national television broadcasts — a good many Caps fans were tuned in to his radio call near 10:50 last night. Those who were won’t soon forget it.

Put any team under a microscope, and you will find flaws. The Capitals have theirs to be sure. But a team that can take the #2-seeded defending Stanley Cup champions and battle them to a Game 7 elimination at their home arena, and triumph – that’s a special brand of Red, and one worth celebrating especially in light of all that preceded this spring.

This was a refreshingly different sense of satisfaction than beating the Rangers last year in round 1, and in fewer than 7 games. This was about earning every inch of ice space and ice time you could carve out for yourself. Ask the current captain. Washington needed this; HockeyWashington especially needed this.

RG III arrives in D.C. this evening. How nice would it be for him to join in our Red Party a bit, and hear him reflect amid all those pigskin reporters, “Let’s go Caps!”

It is fun to think about this morning: What might this victory mean for hockey here? Years ago, triumph in a single series was a mere nicety, and something somewhat common for the league’s elite. Today, for this organization, in this town, necessarily it means a great deal more. By virtue of our massive electrified engagement in shared passions, victory and defeat in sports today is mega-magnified, as never before, and last night on line sure seemed special for the D.C. set. It wasn’t difficult to be indifferent to hockey here not all that long ago. This morning, approriately, hockey we think means more.



Seventh Game Aftermath Red Rockin in New England

8 Arlington St., Portland, Maine, 10:55 p.m. Wednesday night — very much Bs country.



Nightmare 4-on-3 Becomes Moment of Pride in Game 6

In all of the peaks and valleys of the Capitals’ loss Sunday to the Bruins, there’s one moment that will hopefully take Capitals fans a long time to forget: the 4-on-3 disadvantage that faced their team from the end of the second period and into the beginning of the third.

Imagine the mental strain it takes to make it through approximately 17  minutes knowing you have the remainder of a 4-on-3 to kill off in what’s a do-or-die game for your opponent. That opponent also happens to have the athlete with the hardest slapshot in the NHL playing on their man advantage.  The score is tied, so there is no room for error. You’ve been one of the team leaders in penalty kill minutes in the postseason, so you know your number is likely to be called.

That was the world of penalty killers Brooks Laich, Karl Alzner and Jay Beagle Sunday after Matt Hendricks took a tripping penalty with less than a minute left in the second period and joined teammate Troy Brouwer in the penalty box.

No wonder Alzner–who had the most shorthanded time on ice for the Caps in the regular season–felt jittery as he waited between periods.

“I was pretty nervous, to be honest,” he told reporters afterwards. “It was fresh ice–guys can move the puck really well, shoot the puck well. … We were getting nervous about it, but we’ve got some good killers.”

To top off the mental strain, Alzner was dealing with a twinge of guilt.

“I gave Hendy a bad pass, and that kind of caused the whole play for the penalty,” he volunteered post-game.

Redemption came quickly. The trio, backstopped by the 22-year-old Braden Holtby, successfully killed of the Bruins’ man advantage. Of course, it came with a price: the official play-by-play has Brooks Laich blocking a pair of shots, including a slapshot courtesy of the one guy you want to avoid, Zdeno Chara.

Who willingly steps in front of a projected missile of rubber coming at you from the strength of a guy whose slapshot can hit 108 miles per hour? Guys like Laich, Alzner, Beagle–who have fought so hard to make it to the NHL that they take nothing for granted. There’s no offseason for guys like this. Their summers are spent building their bodies to be even better the next season. It’s about giving themselves an edge to ensure this precious opportunity to play in the NHL doesn’t go to waste.

That’s what it means in the summer. In playoff hockey come April, it means throwing that body in the way of any puck which threatens your team’s crease.

Ouch.

“It’s the character of the guys that sacrifice their bodies,” their coach, Dale Hunter, said after the game.

It was a sacrifice definitely felt on their bodies after the game, and without the consolation of a win.  But it was a moment in the postseason which should bring pride to the Caps fans who kept Verizon Center throbbing with life for Game 6.

It was true grit.



Keys for an Epic Game 7

Ted’s initial prediction was Bruins in 7.

Mine was Caps in 7.

Two months ago, we would have all been laughing at each other if we’d made such audacious predictions then.

But we’re here, looking at a do-or-die game for both teams in Boston. What are some of the factors going into the game that could make the difference? Ted and I address a few (and with the lovely hum of the zamboni for background music).



Here’s Hoping

Mostly, I hope the Legend who selflessly and at no small personal sacrifice answered George McPhee’s plea back in autumn leaves the Chinatown rink this evening savoring unique triumph, as the bench leader of the crest for which he too often, as Capitals captain, endured springtime disappointment.

The Washington Capitals have never vanquished a defending Stanley Cup champion from the postseason, and I hope they do so today. If they do, I hope Dale Hunter makes his way over to Bugsy’s for a couple of victory beers this evening. They’d be on the house.

I hope Hockey Washington similarly gets to savor an all too elusive triumph in this nutty and nails-gnawing time of year. It would go a long way to purging the memory of a regular season we’d rather forget.

I hope Coach Hunter wears his red necktie today, the one given to him by the Capitals owner when he arrived in the autumn, and I hope beginning tomorrow we see a run on red neckties at all of Washington’s clothiers.

I hope the boys don’t have to pack their bags again for another charter to Boston. Including the postseason they’ve won four out of five games in TD Garden, but asking them to triumph again, for a third consecutive time there, in a game 7, seems a very tall order.

I hope Zdeno Chara, whose 27 minutes yesterday seemed like 47, is especially fatigued for today’s faceoff, which arrives about 20 hours after game 5′s conclusion. Similarly, I hope 38-year-old Tim Thomas is feeling his years from the short turnaround time. Conversely, I hope 22-year-old Braden Holtby feels spry like someone his age typically does, no matter the duration of his labor.

Around 5:45 this evening I hope to hear John Walton scream a victory call that reverberates about the arena rafters as only his can.

It’s been a remarkably competitive and ferocious showdown between Alexander Ovechkin and Zdeno Chara in this series, and given the struggles and scrutiny our captain has endured the past two years, I hope he realizes triumph today, and earns a new level of respect about the league. To that end, I hope he plays a lead hand in victory today.

I hope in a victorious post-game presser the coach looks out among the media throng and sees the Washington Post’s Mike Wise and asks a pointed question of the scribe. (He won’t, whereas, were I in his position, I would.)

I hope Mr. Leonsis has his entire family in his box today, and that the man who’s invested so much fortune and so much of his heart into making this a better sports town realizes, in the company of his loved ones, a brief moment of supreme satisfaction.

I hope today the Capitals get to rewrite a bit the largely sorry legacy that is their postseason narrative.

I hope simply, as a native, hockey-loving Washingtonian: I hope for more hockey in spring. At this point in the calendar we who’ve long followed the Capitals know better than to expect. Instead, we hope.



Why Braden Holtby Is Successful

There was one lesson I learned very early on covering the Capitals: look forward to the development and preseason camps, because you have a chance to interview Braden Holtby.

I had a lot of hockey learning to do at the first development camp I covered in ’09—so much, in fact, that I didn’t even realize I’d asked the director of media relations at the time, Nate Ewell, where I could find the PR contact I’d been corresponding with about covering the camp (Kelly Murray, who put up with my rather clueless initial email about interview requests).  And Braden—as young as he was then—was very patient with my questions. I could ask him about things like Jim Craig’s mind technique in the 1980 Olympics, and Braden would always give answers that helped clarify a goalie’s mindset—or at least as much as a “civilian” like me could understand.

I learned a lot, so I got into the habit of bugging him at every camp he attended in D.C. I think eventually he got used to it—I always wonder what players think about reporters who consistently pepper them with odd questions; but Braden never laughed at them or showed annoyance, answering questions with the gravity of a professor–a trait he’s kept through this postseason.  He was polite, would remember me from summer to summer or September to September (depending on the camp), and always had good answers ready. One time, he came out of the locker room at Kettler still with a whole bunch of goalie equipment on, but he still sat down on the bench next to the rink and answered as many questions as I had.

I learned a lot about hockey, but I also learned a lot about the athlete and his mindset through these interviews. And this is something I think reporters rarely give enough weight to nowadays.

As a reporter, judging a player’s attitude as it relates to hockey is tricky. You only actually interact with them for a few moments each day; you may see them play on the ice for an hour or two each day. You may never really know much about what kind of person they are away from the rink. It seems much more reliable to go with what the accepted hockey wisdom is (don’t start young, inexperienced goalies in the playoffs) and statistics.  But you miss a key ingredient in your analysis if you do so.

When it comes to hockey, Braden Holtby is a perfectionist. He’s got the kind of edge that means he’ll never be taken for granted. He always plays like his last meal was four days ago. And he’s got sick skills. But he’s also a student of the game, and willing to adjust accordingly. And it’s that odd, cold, calm analytical aspect—one that you can hear in every postgame press conference, and one that you could decipher when he answered, as a 19 year old, random questions about the heart of a goaltender’s game—which tames the fury and polishes the talent, and makes him the kind of goalie that can keep his team right where they need to be in the Stanley Cup playoffs.

It was kind of an odd moment to be sitting in the Verizon Center press box Thursday and hearing Holtby’s name announced as the starting goalie. Because we journalists have a tendency toward being egocentric and relating everything back to ourselves, it was fun to think back to all the times where there had been little media around Braden at all and you could sit and ask him questions for as long as you wanted.  In reality, I’m sure, many of the media have stories very similar to mine about chatting with him. But I got a sneaking suspicion Thursday that it’s going to be difficult to casually ask for a one-on-one interview with Holtby at a Caps training camp again without it being a big deal. I had already been surprised it hadn’t caught on this past September after his successful NHL debut the previous year.

It was obvious, too, as the evening progressed. In the locker room after Thursday’s game, you couldn’t escape Holtby’s influence. I didn’t even go into his media scrum (one of the largest groups of the night, I’m happy to report), but he was often the subject of the other scrums I was in with other players. I think Brooks Laich got asked about Holtby’s awesomeness at least three separate times.

But what really encourages me is that I’ve seen little to no change in any of those characteristics that told me I should put so much confidence in Holtby’s goaltending to begin with. He’s still searching for perfection. He’s still learning and adjusting. And his analytical side of the game appears as sharp as ever–or at least his ability to communicate that.

I think that’s why he’s so successful, and it explains why he can bounce back when all the numbers and all the pundits in the world are stumped. This isn’t to say Holtby won’t struggle in the future or cost the Caps a few games here and there. But I am not the least bit surprised by Holtby’s successful play in this postseason.

The star was there early on for anyone who cared to see it.



© 2006-2012 On Frozen Blog All Rights Reserved