13 October, 2008

Category Archives: Hockey Art

Pictures and Prose Comprising a Lovesong to Our Game

Have you ever wanted to convey all the passion in your hockey heart for the game you cherish to a buddy who just doesn’t get it, and felt meager to the task? Well Andrew Podnieks’ A Canadian Saturday Night: Hockey and the Culture of a Country is both poignant expression of his very hockey heart as well as a marvelously considered reckoning of his country’s congenital love affair with hockey. It is also a beautifully illustrated keepsake for your coffee table. It’s not meant so much to be read cover to cover as coveted and intermittently perused, which in a sense makes it a fantastic light read for summer, when we miss our game so.

While offered from the uniquely Canadian vantage, Podnieks’ prose lovesong actually achieves more than its aim of capturing and illustrating Canada’s puck passion: it fairly invites the reader to testify that Canada’s passion has actually been broadly exported and replicated across oceans and borders. Still, Podnieks is proud of the hold hockey has in his homeland. “You cannot live in Canada without being touched somehow by hockey,” he writes. “And, yes, that is a good thing.”

The work is a set of 65 single-page snapshots from the hockey heart, accompanied by photographs that are alternately historically significant, clever and amusing, and artistically apropos. They have a flair about them, too; how better to convey the odd but enduring allure of ‘Slapshot’ than with a tight shot of Todd McFarlane’s fabled action figures?

Podnieks’ subject(s) matter is meant to convey the fullest range of hockey’s hold on his country, down to the tradition of NHL fans fashioning their own Stanley Cups out of aluminum foil and brandishing them at playoff arenas each spring. In his preface Podnieks powerfully foreshadows his reverence for, and acute insights into, hockey’s storied culture:

“Hockey is not just sport and it’s more than a passion; it is an ingrained part of who we are, how we live our lives and go about our business. Grown men play the game until they are too old and their bones too brittle to endure the rigours of skating . . .

“There is an artistry to the game, both a ferocity and a beauty that make hockey appealing. It’s creative but played at breakneck speed . . . It’s very much a thespian game that develops character and plot . . . It is a game that includes the mentally strong and the emotionally weak, the sportsman and the cheap-shot artist, the hero and the villian, the brave man and the coward.

“Hockey players walk among us — they are like us. They are not overly tall like basketball players; they are not beefed up like football players or juiced up like baseball players. They are essentially average size and weight. What separates them from us is that they are in meticulous physical condition and have incredible speed and strength — and they have an indefatigable will to win that the average person simply does not possess.”

Podnieks knows better than to take his subjects too seriously. Within his rumination of the role beer has played in the live and broadcast consumption of hockey, he writes, “hey, is it just coincidence, or is a beer bottle shaped just like the Stanley Cup but without the bowl on top? Or is it the Cup that’s shaped like a silver beer bottle?”

A sampling of his other subject treatments:

  • House-League Jacket: “A young player cherishes it like it’s his birth certificate, and with it he is accepted into the country called Hockey . . . The jacket authenticates a child’s on-ice endeavors . . . You wear it to tournaments, to special occasions. You never wear your hockey jacket while playing road hockey or doing yardwork . . . It’s essentially a boy’s tuxedo . . . You wear it to school to identify yourself as a hockey player, and in Canada that identity gives you instant credibility.”
  • Grapes: “Cherry got in his hottest water yet when he said the majority of visor-wearing players in the league were French Canadian, a comment that upset many. No one mentioned that, statistically, he was absolutely correct . . . Regardless of controversy, Cherry understands the hockey code, the game played underneath or outside of the rulebook . . . Cherry is something most Canadians are not. He is in your face, unafraid to speak his mind, and seeks the approval of no one . . . he loves the game as he loves life.”
  • Sharp Skates: “A quality skate sharpener is like a barber, tailor, or mechanic — find a good one and you keep him for life.”
  • “CAR!”: “who in this country has not heard the peal of kids’ voices screaming, “Car!” as a car approaches and slows? The ball carrier puts his foot on the ball to stop play officially and maintain possession. The goalies pick up the nets like they’re gates at a border crossing and move to the side of the road to let the car pass. They then move their nets back to the middle of the road, and the game continues. You do this until it gets dark, or until the guy whose ball it is says he has to go home for dinner, or until you’re simply too tired. The next day, you play some more.”

“This book is an attempt to define the collective history of the sport,” Podnieks writes. He’s collected hockey history all right. I hope he finds more of it.

If the Caps Were To Pursue a Third Sweater . . .

There’s been a good deal of online chatter this week regarding third sweaters. Eighteen NHL teams will introduce alternate jerseys this season, according to the Fan590’s Howard Berger. Icethetics and Puck Daddy have been monitoring the fashion situation as well. So we put the question to the Caps: Any chance a third sweater is in the near future?

The answer is no. At least not this season, we were told. And that makes sense; it was just last summer that the team introduced two new sweaters, so some marketing “breathing space” is appropriate. And if you’ll recall, the Caps were one of 30 victims poorly served by Reebok’s initial uniform redesign. Additionally there’s the successful Rock the Red campaign; a third jersey so soon would just distract consumers from the home reds.

But in these ever-evolving uniform times, can a third Caps’ sweater be that far off? And what might it look like? This got our happy hour heads pondering this week, so after a few puck sodas we set off to the Photoshop to test out some ideas. Here are the design concepts that guided our final product:

  • A base color of blue — the natural choice to complete the patriotic and team-colors circles.
  • A classic look. The Caps’ redesigned uniforms of a year ago were a terrific success in incorporating the much-admired original look with a contemporary update . . . yet it’s an undeniably modern-looking hockey jersey. So with the third one we sought some distinction from the other two — a more classic look and feel — the type of sweater that would look at home on someone playing pond hockey.
  • The team’s existing secondary logo didn’t necessarily have to be the new primary logo on a third sweater design, but blown up large on the blue background it stands out quite well.
  • We used ONFROZENBLOG for the “player name” — a fairly long pseudo-surname — and it seems to still be readable. For instance, it’s one less character than KONOWALCHUK; Kono’s sweater’s nameplate seemed to stretch from elbow to elbow on the old Dome design, yet was still illegible. These letters are based on the current uniform’s font (with color changes) and seem like they’d stand up to long-distance reading.
  • We love the three stars that accompany the Caps’ primary logo, representative of the team’s support in Maryland, the District, and Virginia; for our third sweater we placed them on the shoulders, signifying the region’s hockey hopes carried on the team’s collective shoulders. We’d considered rotating them 90 degrees and having them run down the shoulder’s seam (a la the Caps’ classic sweater); let us know if you have strong feelings one way or the other about the stars’ placement.
  • Draw-string collaring was a must. The Caps have never had it; it hasn’t yet become so common a feature as to be cliche; and on a sweater design striving for a throwback, classic look, it seems like icing on the fashion cake.

So our final result is below. We strove for something more than minimalist, yet not cluttered. It is intended to represent the team and the region, and is hopefully something that would age well. But this is just one blogging team’s (admittedly fun) effort — we’re looking for your feedback, suggested improvements and, if you’re so inspired, perhaps your very own third sweater design posted as a comment.

So in the spirit of Marvel Comics’ old “What If…” title, we hope you enjoy this concept of a Caps’ Sunday Sweater as much as we did designing it:

Morning Cup-a-Spirit: This Bigotry Against Babes, I Won’t Stand for It!

To read the reactions left only here related to the Caps’ plans, announced over the weekend, to introduce SpiritBabes to the team’s home games next season, you’d think management announced that Verizon Center was hosting 41 brothels next winter.

It’s too warm in there for brothels anyway.

Would that the peasants took up pitchforks and torches in these numbers when the league bleep-canned hockey jerseys for Reebok’s tuxedo vests a year ago.

Count me among those with a more inclusive spirit — one who will approach the scheme with an open mind. I take the owner at his word (”I am a family man with a wife and daughter“).

I was all prepared to write about my first one-on-one chat with Hershey Bears’ head coach Bob Woods on Saturday when this fracas broke out later that day. No wonder Washington is consistently regarded as a sex-appeal-less city.

In reality, though, all the NHL is doing is catching up — modestly, I might add — with football’s spirited sidelines. Or Fox News. In a culture of seriously foxy FoxNews, is this really anything to get all that worked up about?

But by late yesterday we’d received pointed clarification from the Capitals on the matter: “The squad won’t be ice girls in the traditional sense . . . It’s also not a dance squad, a la the NBA. It’s more of an evolution of the entertainment team we have had in the past” [the one that most in the stands thought was remarkably annoying -- I'm all for evolving that].

Still, I found it riotously funny to learn that Bruce Cassidy had contacted the team’s sales department Sunday seeking a full plan for next season. And Smoken Al Koken — has he been revived since Saturday’s news?

Actually, you can make a compelling argument I think that hockey, particularly in markets like Washington, is much more in need of some sultry spirit than is the NFL. Mr. Leonsis, in defending the move on Sunday, noted that it was with new revenue in mind that the team pursued the idea. In case you hadn’t noticed, television ain’t exactly throwing mad dough at the NHL’s 30 clubs these days. Meanwhile, the league’s salary cap has mushroom-clouded by more than $15 million in just the three seasons since the lockout.

It’s swell that we’re all in love with this rockin’ garage band called hockey, but the band still has to be paid, and if Hooters-Lite (not Hustler) wants to underwrite the Friday night jam session, I think the beer will still taste cold. Count me as one who wants a hockey team’s practices, scrimmages, and camps to remain free and open to the public, year round.

Anyone remember the millions the NHL spent on its post-lockout relaunch television advertisements — you remember the ones, the “My NHL” spots featuring the hockey locker room beefcake, rather shirtless, massage-motivated by a Fox News anchor in the pre-game? I remember thinking the first time I watched it, ‘My, how shirtless this hockey player is, and my, how little I now want lunch.’ Now that was profane, and brought to you by Bettman & Co. I’m confident that Ted doesn’t have quite that in mind.

I’m not sure what revenue the Washington Redskins’ cheerleaders bring in to the team, but whenever they make community appearances you seldom hear of Puritanical protests accompanying them or of anyone having a real lousy time at them. In fact, once in a while, the tight end marries the babe. Maybe the SpiritBabe will marry the bachelor blogger.

The Capitals, and hockey in Washington, need increased exposure (if you’ll pardon my word choice). If the Caps’ SpiritBabes are going to be out and about town during and after seasons hence, perhaps toting along a few congenial players with them, it’s bound to improve the team’s visibility, as well as that of the sport.

And in our recessionary times, where is the acknowledgment of the idea’s job creation ???

There’s been all manner of hyperbole associated with this past weekend’s high-pitched hue and cry reaction. For instance, some have alleged that the aisle ladies in their shimmer and shake will distract from the play on the ice. On nights when the Caps lay an egg, I agree — and let’s hope so. On those nights especially I’ll be glad for Verizon Center’s new state-of-the-art, high-rise, high definition, center ice scoreboard. But really, if the Alexanders are barreling down the ice on a two-on-one scoring chance, how many men’s and women’s eyes will be fixated on tight fannies in the stands?

And what of the selectivity of outrage in this instance? When it’s Mites on Ice, all are quiet, despite the fact that with that exhibition the laughter is generated at the expense of really, really short people. But raise the specter of pretty girls prettying up the District’s rink, and all hell breaks loose.

The only genuine harm that can come from this scheme is if, to quote the wit of one of the few in this town with a sense of humor, who imparted it in the maelstrom of message board madness yesterday, “they come down to the Johnny Walker Club after the game and are attracted to out-of-shape middle-aged men.”

When Messrs. Vogel, Parker, Rucki and I were taking in the World Championships in Moscow in the spring of 2007, we had no shortage of aisle-jiggling accompanying our blogging endeavors (see photo above). I think I can speak for the four of us in saying that we got our work done just dandy. In point of fact, the real distraction in terms of Moscow hotties diverting our gaze came with the middle-of-the-night trollop parade through our hotel’s lobby (where we were blog drafting), aided and abetted by bellhops on the cash take.

Baltic beauties in boas and hip-high black boots. Naughty, naughty Nikitas! Sorry, that was the indulgence of reverie.

Anyway, over in Moscow, we learned that NHL scouts were in favor of off-ice girls.

!

Perhaps since Alexander Ovechkin has to spend the next 13 seasons skating here we should let him be the arbiter in the matter.

We’re Hollywood Star-Struck

Forgive us this hiccup of indulgence — yesterday the makers and marketers of the documentary ‘Pond Hockey’ referred to OFB as their favorite blog.

Well, from the early looks of things, they’re our favorite documentarians. Now that July in D.C. is upon us (and Happy Canada Day to our cousins to the North!), be sure to visit the film’s web site when you need a helping hand in getting cooled off during these dog days of summer.

When Son of Ishtar Attacks Lord Stanley

In the last six months we’ve been contacted by representatives from two different feature-length films, both including hockey in their stories. We were provided with promotional material and politely asked to assist in the marketing endeavors. We found the outreach flattering, and so we obliged.

We are greatly anticipating the release of ‘Pond Hockey’ this November, and will assist its filmmakers additionally in every manner we possibly can.

With Mike Myers’ ‘The Love Guru,’ now in its third week of screening nationwide, not so much enthusiasm . . . insomuch as the film, accumulating from critics an average grade of D+, is quickly earning the ignominious designation as one of the worst cinematic creations in the history of humanity.

Rotten Tomatoes has tabulated 122 reviews of the abomination and classified 103 of them as rotten.

“It’s just deadly,” exclaims Richard Roeper of Ebert & Roeper.

“Holy Dave Keon!” begins Newsday’s ‘Sportswatch’ columnist Neil Best. “Even I am shocked by the level of disgust over [The Love Guru] being expressed by movie critics.”

The dreck, which cost $64 million to make, to date has grossed just $13 million (and likely will limp to $20 million). Who would have imagined a month ago that a Mike Myers comedy with one Jessica Alba in the cast would struggle to surpass the gross receipts of say ‘Meatballs 4,’ ‘Snowboard Academy,’ ‘Die Hard Dracula,’ and ‘Soccer Dog: The Movie’ ?

The Internet Movie Database has a ranking of a “Bottom 100″ films of all time; look for ‘Love Guru’ to make its debut in it soon.

For me, it’s poetic justice. ‘Guru’s’ marketers concocted all manner of disingenuous pledges of admiration for each and every hockey blog it solicited. They sugared us with flattery and even went so far as to claim that OFB’s assistance was one that was going to be “personally conveyed to Mike Myers.” Whatever.

We feel dirty for having participated in the mass e-marketing of this bomb, and while we know that it’s metaphysically impossible for more than 11 or 12 or our readers to have patronized it, to them, we express particular and red-faced regret. Your tickets to ‘Pond Hockey’ are on us.

But imagine the blazered communications and PR flacks in the NHL’s New York office. The league went above and beyond in its support of the crap film. Amazingly enough, today the league still acknowledges its supporting role on its web site. I wonder if Gary Bettman had a say in the matter?

Anyway, we’ll talk no more of this movie monstrocity, and instead try and cleanse your film palate with this promotional snippet for the movie we’re proud to have associated ourselves with.

YouTube Preview Image

Search No More for a Great Hockey Read This Summer: Stephen Brunt Finds the Essence of Bobby Orr

Perhaps half or more of contemporary hockey fans never saw the incomparable Bobby Orr perform, and with this in mind, we’re indebted to Stephen Brunt and his literary landscape-altering effort Searching for Bobby Orr (Triumph Books, 2007).

A Canadian sports journalist, a hockey fan and one of Bobby Orr most particularly, Brunt in his book catapults us back into the rural rearing grounds of Parry Sound, Ontario, of the 1950s and ’60s. He invites us into his immaculately constructed, heart-felt reminiscence of an iconic prodigy, a figure whose virtuosity transcended his sport.

It was Orr — not Richard, not Howe — who first represented hockey for Sports Illustrated in its Sportsman of the Year designation, in 1970.

A literature professor once told me you could identify a great book by the success or failure of its opening and closing sentences. If those two impress you, he told me, you can be reasonably assured that what resides between them is nourishing as well. Brunt begins his examination of Orr thusly:

“On the river, he could skate forever.”

Actually, the concluding paragraph of Brunt’s Prologue foretells a special treatment thereafter. In it he artfully delineates his first-ever attendance at a hockey game, as a youth in Ontario, the beneficiary of a hockey-loving neighbor who prevailed upon Brunt’s hockey-indifferent father. Back then, there was no such thing as attending a Maple Leafs game by the common Ontario family. So Brunt in the company of his neighbor Reg did what just about everybody else did then — he patronized the local junior team. But there was a particular reason for attending on the particular day they did:

“Remember, Reg said. Remember who it was you saw today. Remember so you can tell your own kids someday. Remember. For forty years, I have tried my best.”

Hockey, for Canadians, Brunt tells us, “seems organic. It emerges out of the trees and rocks and ice, out of the long winter months, the rare, precious daylight, out of facing down nature, surviving and embracing whatever it can throw at us, enduring to spring.” It is a reflection that speaks directly to the plasma and marrow of the book’s subject. Bobby Orr wasn’t manufactured in any rink or out of any structured hockey program. His greatness arrived remarkably early in life, outdoors, and it arrived of his own passion and seemingly of God’s blessings.

Just how great, how early? For the 1962-63 hockey season Orr joined the Oshawa Generals as a bantam-aged 14-year-old. The Generals were so covetous of him that they allowed him to skip all of the team’s practices during the week, every week, and merely skate in the team’s weekend games, in deference to mother Orr’s wishes. He was selected as a second-team All Star that rookie season in Juniors. He also completed the eighth grade.

Brunt is at his best when honing in on his memory’s scrapbook of Orr’s brilliance on the ice. It is a memory that paints a vivid portrait of a player forever changing the confining notion of his position before reaching his twentieth birthday.

“Wherever he was on the ice, the puck just seemed to come to him, as though directed by a higher force. And when he carried it, when he was stickhandling, Orr never needed to look down. He could somehow feel the puck there on his stick blade . . . Orr’s skating ability was remarkable but not startling at first glance . . . Orr seemed to have five or six different speeds, different gears, each of which he could achieve without any obvious extra effort. When he accelerated, there were no little stutter steps to get going, just the same smooth, graceful motion.”

If it’s numbers you need to evaluate Orr’s best-ever brilliance, consider no more than this one: in his 1970-71 season with the Bruins Orr amassed a plus-minus tally of . . . plus one hundred and twenty four. To put that feat into perspective, consider that in his absolute prime — 1985 — the 208-pt. Wayne Gretzky skated a +98.

“The truth is,” Brunt observes, “you can adjust Orr’s statistics all you want, you can build in qualifiers, and he still stands alone . . . Just measure Orr against his contemporaries. Measure him against all others competing in the same position. There is no comparison — and his 1970-71 season stands alone as the greatest ever played by a defenseman, if not the greatest ever played by anyone in the history of the NHL.”

In chronicling Orr’s era and the athlete’s role in it Brunt selects New York Jets’ quarterback Joe Namath as a referent, a touchstone to #4. The two achieved stardom strikingly early in their pro careers, and as the ’60s ushered in redefined notions of culturally acknowledged sexuality in America, both exuded compelling and marketed-for-the-first-time-by-athletes sex appeal. But Brunt wants his reader to recognize the limitations with the comparison. Namath actively nurtured his sexual aura, and sought off-the-field fortune and diversion with it. Orr’s was less brazen and crude — he was Canadian modest through and through.

To an extent. Brunt’s eighth chapter, ‘Spin the Bobby,’ ventures where no others in journalism seemed to have before. It details the late-night practice by Orr in Boston bars when, well-beered, he’d stand before a literal wall-length of willing women and submit to being spun around by his teammates, his right arm and index finger outstretched, and end the evening back home with her his spinning stopped upon.

And did you know that Orr’s influence extended even to America’s strip clubs, based on his method of taping his stick?

” . . . years later, in the stripper’s trade, a ‘Bobby Orr’ would be a way of describing how the girls on stage trimmed their pubic hair, with just one strip down the middle.”

Who knew a biography of Bobby Orr could be a summer potboiler?

The story of Orr can’t be told without its tragic dimension: ‘Hockey Achilles’ is the narrative of the Orr knees. There are two inescapable truths about them (principally his left one): almost certainly they bore an inherent weakness or fragility that bordered on the congenital; and were his career to have commenced just 10 years later than it did, it’s virtually certain most if not all of the insidiously aggressive, invasive corrective procedures on them — career-shortening in their cumulation — would have been avoided.

I can’t guarantee that Searching for Bobby Orr will be the best book you read this summer. But I can guarantee though that should you pick it up you’ll finish it with a heightened love for the game we love.

The Enduring Appeal of Hockey’s Warmup Skate

It is a ritual unlike anything else is sports. Fifteen minutes of a 20-man army unified in its movements and initiative. A synchronized orchestration on skates that announces the evening’s novelty of grace, timing, ferocity, and breathtaking skill. It’s sports’ most poignant prelude.

Does hockey have the most alluring and impressive pre-game warm-up in all of sports? Yes — and by a wide margin.

It is an event that ensnares the young especially, but quite often the parent as well, and with a comparable sense of awe and devotion.

We are moths to this flame.

To arrive at the rink in time to see warm-ups is to feel treated to bonus exposure to the planet’s greatest athletes, but also something more: it is to be witness to a highly stylized symphony of sights and sounds, the collective of which is a compelling commercial for hockey’s culture.

Unlike the pre-game routines of others sports, which commonly involve coaches organizing and orchestrating them, unsupervised hockey players appear to know instinctively when, where, and what to do on the ice 30 minutes before each game. They execute their exercises silently, sure of every movement. It is a display of the artist in the athlete, the armored warrior also the theater stage star: movements well-rehearsed, very well synchronized, poignant and powerful, the actors showcasers of sublime skills. There are long-established, well-regimented drills within the warm-up for the team to carry out, but there are as well, detected by the keen eye, isolated, individual exhibitions of other-worldly virtuosity.

Its purpose is to work up a sweat, but in the process it also inspires.

No matter the time of year that hockey is being played at Verizon Center hundreds of fans flock down as close to the rink plexiglass as they can for the 6:30 warm-up by the evening’s teams. Verizon Center, to its credit, has a policy allowing any ticketholder to scurry down low to the venue’s up-close seats to watch the entirety of the pre-game skate. The result is an every-night swarm of admirers hard by the glass, the young in rapture, their elders viewing with young hearts — both united in an appreciation for their dream access.

The players themselves seem to recognize how special a cultural moment in the sport this skate is. For Bobby Hull it was often an opportunity to sign programs clutched and extended out over the glass by boyhood Chicago. (The Golden Age of Hockey, with its lower side glass, allowed for a wonderful accessibility of fan to player.) At around 6:28 each game evening Alexander Ovechkin bolts out of the open gate of the Capitals’ bench like a rodeo bull too long lodged in its pen, seizes a puck before any teammate, and races with it for the warmup’s first wicked wrist shot rifled into the cage. He is, technically, 22 years old in this moment, but in his zeal and glee for the feat he may as well be 13 and in the throes of first-love with hockey.

Football players stretch and in dull assemblies conduct walk-throughs with their position coaches. Basketballers have layup lines (yawn). Baseball players meander through BP, leisurely ground balls, and fungo bat fly balls. But pre-game hockey, any night of the week, offers a Saturday night symphony of spectacular sights and sounds.

There is drama even to the procession of players rifling wrist shots into the unguarded cage in the skate’s opening moments. Which player can with the most precision pick the cage’s top corners? Whose shot carries so much sting that its riccochet returns the puck well out back into the skating slot? In my own warmups as a player I much never minded the misses on the pre-game net so long as they delivered that piercing crack against the plexi-glass; I figured it produced something for the netminder at the other end to think about.

The two teams take pains (most of the time) to respect the half-sheet territoriality of the skate, and this, too, adds an aura to the moment. Montreal’s Claude Lemieux precipitated perhaps the NHL’s most infamous pre-game brawl in the 1987 Eastern Conference finals versus Philadelphia. Lemieux liked to shoot a puck into the opposing net at the end of the warmup skate. The 1980s Flyers (Dave Brown, Rick Tocchet, Craig Berube, Scott Mellanby), as you might imagine, took none too kindly to this habit. On the night in question the Flyers even turned their cage around at the end of the skate to impede Lemieux. He outwaited them and fired away. Before it was all over, there were players brawling out on the ice in their socks and shower sandals.

Always there is a blood-warming soundtrack, too, to the prelude skate — carefully selected, generally hard rockin’ tracks that seem in synch with the high-octane mission ahead. From bantam to beer league to big league, loud rock music is a staple of player warmups. I’ve long meant to solicit from the beer league-ing among our readers their pre-game playlists and see what songs most commonly get cued up. Marilyn Manson a few years back seemed to offer up an anthem for eternity for hockey warm-ups in rinks across the globe:

I don’t want you and I don’t need you/ don’t bother to resist, I’ll beat you/ It’s not your fault that you’re always wrong/ the weak ones are there to justify the strong/ the beautiful people, the beautiful people

Whether I was 7 or 37 I never ceased to appreciate how thoroughly two NHL teams could chew up a 200-by-85 sheet of fresh ice with a mere 15 minutes of fluid labor. At 6:45 their snow-crusted sheet looks identical to the one inhabited for an hour by 200 Saturday public sessions skaters at the community rink.

I suppose my exposure to warm-up skates at old Capital Center was formative: it wasn’t just that I was young then but that the Pringle Chip’s seats were enveloped in such pervasive darkness, and so the shimmering white ice below that greeted the warm-up arrival, with so many players rushing about it helmetless, their era-appropriate long hair fluttering gallantly as their skate blades crunched and smacked pucks hissed, was hero-forming.

Warm-ups have changed a bit since then. They’re shorter now, it seems — 15 minutes instead of about 20. Also, slapshots have all but disappeared from them. I remember well the firing squad along the blueline pelting Al Jensen and Ron Low and Pete Peeters and Don Beaupre. I must have watched a thousand of these slapshots at the old barn before I turned 15, ever awestruck at their velocity and the nano-second of interlude between launches. Perhaps it’s because today’s sticks are so expensive, and the velocity they generate so significant, that slapshots have been removed from the routine. But it may also be the case that slapshots have dissipated greatly in games in general, as the time and space they require have vanquished — so players simply are warming up with the shots they most commonly use in games.

NHLers, all, were themselves at one time the wide-eyed, nose-pressed-against-the-plexi-glassers, and it isn’t uncommon to see players today toss a puck up over the glass or even bestow an underperforming (nonetheless still expensive) stick to a lucky youth at the end of these warm-up minutes. More common are the winks and smiles players perched next to the glass will direct at their young admirers on the other side. Eras change in hockey, but the sport’s elite continue to connect with their core constituents in this special slice of time.

Hockey Helping Heal Family Hurt

Disappointed that my father couldn’t attend our screening of ‘The Rocket‘ at the Avalon Theater this past December, I made the DVD a Christmas present to him. (He was thrilled.) Throughout January when we spoke on the telephone I was quick to ask if he’d found a quiet evening at home to view it. He hadn’t. I found this curious, and somewhat disappointing, for as I enjoyed the film so thoroughly, I knew he would, too. But in his retirement my father is anything but sedentary and stationary, and so even something as seemingly pedestrian as movie night at home can be hard to come by.

It was a sad coincidence for me to learn last week, not long after I heard of the Capitals traveling with their fathers on their roadtrip South, that I’d be spending the weekend with my father — our first visit together in 2008 — under the most unfortunate of circumstances: gathering to get past the passing of his mother. He learned of his loss last week while on a Caribbean sailing vacation, hastily cut it short, joined family for the remembrance, and at his mother’s funeral delivered a stunning and moving eulogy. Now without both parents, Dad is feeling “orphaned.”

I was in his Maryland Eastern Shore home all of about seven minutes this weekend before he initiated talk of the Saturday night victory by the Caps in Tampa. “Did you see that game last night?” he asked me with victory voice and wide eyes. We talked of the superb passing by both teams, the heart-wrenching, concluding drama, the visiting team’s resiliency. He knew, too, of my appearance on Saturday night radio in Washington to discuss the Caps, and when the Chesapeake Bay poorly cooperated with his radio reception of the broadcast at home he hopped in his car and began driving around the shore to find better reception.

Dad and I aren’t emotive in tough times; instead, we find the seemingly necessary solace simply in one another’s company. With this in mind I shouldn’t have been surprised at our next discussion.

“We’re going to watch the movie tonight,” he said, with no small enthusiasm. The screening, it became clear, was to be the centerpiece of my visit. Turns out, he had no intention of watching the movie without me, no matter how long that took. And this weekend ‘The Rocket’ represented a fresh immersion in the pursuit that has consistently — over the course of our more than 35 years of sharing it — delivered the fondest and most rewarding of life experiences together.

In my youth Dad was alternately my soccer coach, my Little League manager, my supporter in the stands in hoops and junior varsity football. But it was when he first took me to the neighborhood ice rink for my first skating lessons that a special and lasting sporting bond forged between us. I don’t think skating comes easy to any beginner, no matter how athletically gifted. I remember well my struggles and how after each session of Saturday lessons Dad always aided my perseverance by removing my skates and rubbing my young pained feet back to life.

Later, once I’d become proficient with my skating, he infuriated my mother by taking me along on his Friday night pickup skates near midnight — when the ice was cheap and available — when all other 10- and 11-year-olds were fast asleep. Later still, when I was in high school and working weekends at the local rink, he’d assure my mother that the reason I wasn’t returning home from Saturday night shifts was because I was skating after hours with college-aged hockey playing staff, literally until sunrise, then collapsing on a cot in the rink’s First Aid room. My mother was convinced that hockey couldn’t be my mistress every Saturday night when I was 14 and 15 and 16 and 17. My father knew better.

His shore home is well equipped for Blockbuster night — or Hockey Night in Canada: 48 inches of Panasonic, wall-hung high definition above the fireplace. Center Ice subscribed to. We had a roaring fire in the fireplace, our feet up, beers and spirits on the coasters at our feet. We were seated next to one another on his couch with not six inches separating us. That in itself felt healing.

I explained to him the necessity of absorbing the film in its Francophone rendering, with English subtitles. He needed about 25 minutes of it before he professed Stephen McHattie’s work as Habs’ coach Dick Irvin “magnificent.” He was absorbed, and I was grateful.

A great home in a great location has a way of breeding enthusiastic loyalty among friends and former business associates, and so my father’s telephone rings a lot. It’s about that time of year when the calls begin announcing intended spring and summer weekend visits. Dad is always generous with his time and attentions on the phone, but I noticed that with this film on pause during the calls he was quite short on the phone. He took perhaps five calls and dispatched all of them with haste. I really think he was enjoying the movie that much.

During opportune times he’d share with me fascinating tidbits about his passion for puck while growing up just outside New York City. I never knew, for instance, that he’d traveled to the old Madison Square Garden just to see Rocket play. I think he paid $2 for that ticket.

When the movie ended and my father judged it superb, he wanted (or needed) more from it, so we began watching the DVD extras. All of them, in French. The phone rang once during that overtime period and again Dad shoulder checked it aside.

Eventually we dimmed the lights on our night, hugged, and went to bed. Breakfast the next morning was delicious, and we talked a lot about the movie some more.

“Outdoor Hockey Is Beautiful”

That’s the sentiment of a couple of Minnesotans behind the making of the documentary ‘Pond Hockey’, now in final editing and awaiting a distributor. The filmmakers believe it’s mere weeks from showing at a theater near you. Eighty minutes of cinema we can’t wait for; sure looks like we have another OFB night at the movies looming. The trailer suggests that the filmmakers have honed in on the heart of the matter:

YouTube Preview Image

As you might expect, Minnesota television stations are on this story like black on fresh lake ice. One treatment can be found here. Still another can be found here.   

But it isn’t just in Minnesota where outdoor puck is being pursued these days. Jeff Jackson’s Notre Dame Fighting Irish got swept by no. 1 Michigan last weekend, so on Monday of last week, with his charges’ spirits slumped, he took them outside for practice, where it was a not so balmy 12 degrees. That story is chronicled here. The Irish, incidentally, rebounded and swept Bowling Green this past weekend.    

Update: We heard this afternoon from Andrew Sherburne, ‘Pond Hockey’s’ Producer. The first closed screening for cast and crew will take place in a matter of weeks, while the actual release isn’t quite that close. We’ll keep you informed.

“The Rocket” Comments by Weber and Labre

We were lucky to have had former Washington Capital Yvon Labre and former radio play-by-play voice Ron Weber not only attend OFB’s viewing of “The Rocket”, but they graciously took the microphone in hand at the front of the theatre to answer questions and provide a little insight as well.

Here is a short video with part of their observations.
YouTube Preview Image

‘The Rocket’ Belongs with the Best in Hockey Filmmaking

If you couldn’t attend OFB Night at the Movies last night, you still have two evenings — tonight and tomorrow — to make it over to the Avalon during its week-long screening of ‘The Rocket.’ I highly recommend you doing so. I would not term ‘The Rocket’ a great movie but rather a good one that was, for me, deeply affecting. A good movie has a way of staying with you a while after the credits roll, the lights go up, and even a day or three later, when your brain hits ‘refresh’ with reminiscing images. That, for this viewer, is ‘The Rocket.’ The film won nine Genie awards — the Canadian equivalent of Oscars — and near 11:00 last night I knew why.

Before midnight last night I’d heard from a handful of friends in the theater express their surprise at the enormity of Maurice Richard’s career. And these impressions had little to do with the number of goals he’d scored.

These friends were Canadians and Americans, and they were reacting with me in precisely a vein I think the filmmaker’s had hoped for. By now you’ve heard that the film has as its heart the issue of bigotry directed at French Canadians in the first half of 20th century North American professional hockey. One Canadian in particular came up to me afterward and shared how emotional she’d become by the film’s illustration of the the brutal, even life-threatening violence directed Richard’s way.

Films that tackle pressing social issues always engage in high-risk endeavors. When they are well made, they are able to avoid a sense of strong-armed didacticism — hautily lecturing the movie-going public. Success here depends on a filmmaker’s adherence to subtlety as well as delineating a nuanced fluency with the issue. ‘The Rocket,’ I thought, achieved this rather gloriously.

And speaking of illustration, the visual beauty of ‘The Rocket’ is what distinguishes it from all other hockey films. Ron Weber told us afterward that he actually felt Montreal’s snowy cold while seated in the Avalon, and I, too, owned up to feeling transported back to 1940s and ’50s Canada. Director Charles Biname offers a virtuoso performance in cinematography. With great effect he strung together scenes flushed out of color, then, in the blink of an eye, following ones saturated in shimmering water color-like portraits. This was an elaborately illustrated period piece, a feast for the eyes. As such, it made for me a wonderful seasonal theater immersion.

Roy Dupuis’ performance in the lead is consistently brilliant. Richard the hockey player matures from isolated introvert to battered agent of social change, and Dupuis accords that notable progression great dignity and credibility. But I most enjoyed Stephen McHattie’s performance as the Canadiens’ maestro behind the bench, Dick Irvin. The story of the relationship between Irvin and Richard is one for its own movie, which Biname honors. This film has at least a half dozen scenes of great emotional impact, and my favorite involved Irvin in the Habs’ locker room late in Richard’s career, when the Rocket’s advocacy for change perhaps secured its most notable convert.

OFB Night at the Movies

The Rocket
Join OFB along with Connect2Canada and the Washington Capitals for
OFB Night at the Movies: ‘THE ROCKET’
Tuesday, 18 December, 2007 - 8:30pm
The Avalon Theatre - 5612 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20015

Drop us a line with your full name and reserve your seats today: email@onfrozenblog.com
The Rocket

Join Us for OFB Night at the Movies: ‘The Rocket’

The Rocket - Movie PosterIf you’re like us, once or twice in December you like to take a break from the tsunami sea of shopping mall humanity and spend a couple of hours tucked inside a dark theater for a holiday season movie. Thanks to the supportive management at the Avalon Theater in Northwest D.C., and a partnership with the Washington Capitals and the Canadian Embassy, OFB readers have an opportunity for precisely this next Tuesday, December 18, when they’re invited to gather at the Avalon for a discounted screening of ‘The Rocket, the Legend of Rocket Richard,’ the icon of icons in Canadian athletic lore.

“As a young boy from blue collar Québec, Richard had a dream to play in the National Hockey League. Beneath his soft-spoken, working class exterior burned a passion that transformed this young factory worker into “The Rocket.” In the 1950s pre-helmet days of hockey, facing constant discrimination, The Rocket played with finesse, speed, and the fire that defied all odds and made him a legend.”

On Tuesday evening, December 18 at 8:30, OFB readers will be able to see ‘The Rocket’ for the discounted admission of $7 at the Avalon. Released in limited distribution in 2005, ‘The Rocket’ has played to strong reviews, and its DVD was released in the U.S. just yesterday. Some notable current and former NHLers had on-screen roles in the film: Sean Avery of the Rangers; Pascal Dupuis of the Thrashers; Ian Lapierriere of the Avalanche; Vincent Lecavalier of the Lightning; Stephane Quintal, a former Canadien; and Mike Ricchi, former Shark and Coyote.

One of Washington’s great old movie houses, the Avalon opened in February 1923 — “when patrons could watch a silent film for thirty cents.” By 2001, the Avalon was the oldest continuously operating movie house in Washington. We won’t get in for thirty cents next Tuesday night, but we’ll be seated in a classic cinematic setting for a strong film. Additionally, the Capitals are working hard to secure a few current and former players to attend, and we’ll have a post-movie bit of Q & A about Rocket and the movie with them.

We may even invite Gene Weingarten and Michael Wilbon.

The Avalon will be screening ‘The Rocket’ for us Tuesday night in Theater 1. We have 125 seats reserved at the discounted $7 admission. All OFB readers wishing to attend Tuesday night must email us their names and those in their party. Given our involvement with the Caps and the Canadian Embassy for this event, seats are sure to go fast. We do not want you driving into town on a whim next Tuesday night only to get shut out. So drop us a line with your full name and reserve your seats today: email@onfrozenblog.com

Who doesn’t like taking in a great flick during the holiday season, and in this instance, surrounded by hundreds of fellow hockey lovers? The Avalon will be showing ‘The Rocket’ each day from December 14 through 20, at 3:15 and 8:30.

The Avalon is located at 5612 Connecticut Ave. NW; (202) 966-6000.

Check out ‘The Rocket’s’ YouTube movie trailer:

YouTube Preview Image

Anomalous Yes, but Hockey Honored in July Is Always Welcome

click for a larger image

Whoa — what’s this bit of Michael Farber insurrection on the cover of Sports Illustrated this week? We’re not sure Farber, one of hockey’s best reporters, had anything to do with it, but SI’s two-week issue now on newsstands dramatically and fabulously honors one of the greatest sports movies of all time — ‘Slapshot.’

It’s likely to rain on some fireworks displays tonight, and if it does in D.C., we’re gonna dust off the Old Classic and enjoy a fresh round of fresh-feeling laughter.

In or out of doors, have a safe and fun-filled 4th, patriotic puckheads.