10 October, 2008

Category Archives: Fighting

Making Gretzky’s Head Bleed

Ah the classic video game. More specifically, the classic hockey video game. Skinny guy, regular guy, or fat guy? Finding the right mix was a dilemma faced by players of Nintendo Ice Hockey. And this distorted yet iconic sound? Why it’s Blades of Steel, a game I spent countless hours playing in my youth. The fact that losing a fight resulted in a penalty made the game even better.

In case you missed it, check out Patrick Hruby’s look back at some of the best (and worst) sports video game innovations over the years. It’s a fond visit to the pixellated past, one that even stretches to include E.T. on the Atari 2600. Hruby is clearly a guy who loved the sports classics, including NHLPA Hockey ‘93. And here’s a terrific example of Instant Replay increasing the joys of gaming:

What’s the only thing better than crushing Doug Gilmour at center ice, stealing the puck from his prone, splayed body, then using Jeremy Roenick to score the game-winning goal for eternal dorm bragging rights and/or beer money? Try replaying that goal, over and over, triggering the goal siren each and every time, until the whining, high-pitched squeal drives your furious roommate into the hallway, beaten and broken.

The beauty that is video-game instant replay is brilliantly (and foul-mouthedly) illustrated in this classic clip from Jon Favreau’s Swingers:

YouTube Preview Image

Just yesterday, Greg Wyshynski posted about his visit to 2K Sports and his interview with Rick Nash. It’s a good read that starts out with a shared love of video games, but goes off on some fun tangents — such as Nash’s heartbreaking revelation that the White Castle scene in Harold & Kumar Go To White Castle was actually filmed in Brampton rather than New Jersey . . . disappointing news to Jersey-born Wyshynski, and to me too as another Jersey kid who dined on the occasional slider or five. Read more about it here; the series continues Tuesday and Wednesday.

That someone remade the Miracle on Ice’s final seconds using Nintendo Ice Hockey drives home the lasting impact of those early games . . . oh, and making all four USA players “skinny guys” was a touch of genius:

YouTube Preview Image

With this oppressive heat wool-blanketing the DC area, it’s best to stay inside. Why not play some video hockey? I just may go dig the old NES box out of the closet and make some heads bleed.

For Love of the Goon

Brashear pummels Brendan Shanahan

My friend’s wife, a Minnesota native, loves a good hockey fight. Oh, she’ll attend fight-free games and enjoy them, but it’s really the fights that get her blood boiling and make the game exciting for her.

She is not alone. The divide between fight fans and fight haters is deeper than ever, with pundits and fans coming down strongly on one side or the other with very little middle ground. Some truly love it as pure gladiator-esque displays of passion. Others see fighting as a deterrent to dirty play–a way for the players to police a game that referees are hard-pressed to manage (”With a guy like Donald Brashear,” per Ted Leonsis, “it’s mutually assured destruction”). Those who hate fighting feel it has no place in the game and cartoonishly taints the sport they love.

Patrick Hruby of ESPN recently delved into “the world of hard-core hockey fight fans, the Cult of the Goon” on a multi-month exploratory mission. He even visited the Phone Booth to take in a Capitals-Penguins game on the strength of a potential Donald Brashear vs. George Laraque fight card (they were disappointed: no fight this time).

Hruby spoke with Ted Leonsis about dropping the gloves in the NHL:

“It’s a balancing act,” Caps owner Ted Leonsis says. “The day after that Atlanta game [OC: the fight-fest in November '06 with 176 PIM, $40k fines], I probably got 400 e-mails. Half of them went like this: ‘How dare you, I took my son or daughter to the game and have never been more embarrassed. I will never go to a game again. Fighting should be outlawed, and Donald Brashear should be suspended for life.’

“Meanwhile, the next e-mail would say, ‘That was the greatest game I’ve ever been to in my life. I love seeing the team stand up for each other.’”

Leonsis laughs. As a hockey fan, he respects and appreciates fighting; as an owner, he says his franchise wouldn’t build a marketing campaign around it. “Now, one complaint is too many. But let’s not forget that Atlanta did TV commercials promoting the rematch.”

Check out the rest of Hruby’s article, including his chat with Minnesota Wild heavyweight Derek Boogaard, in-depth discussions with the videotaping legions of fight fanatics, and a visit to the AHL for some rink-bound pummeling. As always, we invite you to share in the comments where you side in the on-ice pugilism debate.

Sunday’s Alright for Fighting

Here’s a reminder that Hockey Fights Cancer Maryland’s event takes place this Sunday, May 4th. As we told you a few weeks ago, the event features a skate-a-thon with celebrities such as Duff Goldman - Ace of Cakes, skills competition on the ice, broom ball on the ice, rides, carnival games, vendors, food, and a silent auction. Additionally, there will be a Washington Capitals / Philadelphia Flyers alumni hockey game, a special appearance by the Hanson Brothers, Chef Duff from Charm City Cakes, and live music by The Zambonis - North America’s Favorite ALL-HOCKEY Band!

If you can’t make the event, you can still help raise money by participating in the online auction which is now open until 4pm on the 4th. Items include a Nicklas Backstrom signed NHL hat, a white Michael Nylander signed sweater, a 2007-08 Washington Capitals team signed sweater, and more.

YouTube Preview Image

YouTube Preview Image

Here are the particulars: Hockey Fights Cancer Maryland, Sunday, 4 May, 2008 - Ice World in Harford County, Maryland. And if you run into Dave Zamboni, tell him OFB sent you.

Fight Cancer with Hockey, Cake, The Zambonis, and More

My friend Jay not only has a cool job, he knows cool people, too. He recently introduced me to Dave Zamboni who is described by Jay as “the free-skating guitar-man / defenseman for the ultra hip hockey rockers The Zambonis.” Speaking with Dave, he told me about a great event coming to our area in May.

The Zambonis will be performing at a one-day “fun filled extravaganza” to raise money to fight cancer. In addition to The Zambonis playing live, there will be a hockey game, skate-a-thon, skills competition, broom ball, rides, carnival games, vendors, food and Duff “Ace of Cakes” Goldman from Charm City Cakes. Oh…. and to help everyone fight cancer… a special appearance by the Hanson Brothers.

Here are the particulars:
Hockey Fights Cancer Maryland, Sunday, 4 May, 2008 - Ice World in Harford County, Maryland

We’ll have more details as the event draws closer and perhaps even have a special OFB/Zambonis promotion. Until then, check out this brilliant commercial promoting the event.

YouTube Preview Image

The Enduring Appeal of Hockey’s Warmup Skate

It is a ritual unlike anything else is sports. Fifteen minutes of a 20-man army unified in its movements and initiative. A synchronized orchestration on skates that announces the evening’s novelty of grace, timing, ferocity, and breathtaking skill. It’s sports’ most poignant prelude.

Does hockey have the most alluring and impressive pre-game warm-up in all of sports? Yes — and by a wide margin.

It is an event that ensnares the young especially, but quite often the parent as well, and with a comparable sense of awe and devotion.

We are moths to this flame.

To arrive at the rink in time to see warm-ups is to feel treated to bonus exposure to the planet’s greatest athletes, but also something more: it is to be witness to a highly stylized symphony of sights and sounds, the collective of which is a compelling commercial for hockey’s culture.

Unlike the pre-game routines of others sports, which commonly involve coaches organizing and orchestrating them, unsupervised hockey players appear to know instinctively when, where, and what to do on the ice 30 minutes before each game. They execute their exercises silently, sure of every movement. It is a display of the artist in the athlete, the armored warrior also the theater stage star: movements well-rehearsed, very well synchronized, poignant and powerful, the actors showcasers of sublime skills. There are long-established, well-regimented drills within the warm-up for the team to carry out, but there are as well, detected by the keen eye, isolated, individual exhibitions of other-worldly virtuosity.

Its purpose is to work up a sweat, but in the process it also inspires.

No matter the time of year that hockey is being played at Verizon Center hundreds of fans flock down as close to the rink plexiglass as they can for the 6:30 warm-up by the evening’s teams. Verizon Center, to its credit, has a policy allowing any ticketholder to scurry down low to the venue’s up-close seats to watch the entirety of the pre-game skate. The result is an every-night swarm of admirers hard by the glass, the young in rapture, their elders viewing with young hearts — both united in an appreciation for their dream access.

The players themselves seem to recognize how special a cultural moment in the sport this skate is. For Bobby Hull it was often an opportunity to sign programs clutched and extended out over the glass by boyhood Chicago. (The Golden Age of Hockey, with its lower side glass, allowed for a wonderful accessibility of fan to player.) At around 6:28 each game evening Alexander Ovechkin bolts out of the open gate of the Capitals’ bench like a rodeo bull too long lodged in its pen, seizes a puck before any teammate, and races with it for the warmup’s first wicked wrist shot rifled into the cage. He is, technically, 22 years old in this moment, but in his zeal and glee for the feat he may as well be 13 and in the throes of first-love with hockey.

Football players stretch and in dull assemblies conduct walk-throughs with their position coaches. Basketballers have layup lines (yawn). Baseball players meander through BP, leisurely ground balls, and fungo bat fly balls. But pre-game hockey, any night of the week, offers a Saturday night symphony of spectacular sights and sounds.

There is drama even to the procession of players rifling wrist shots into the unguarded cage in the skate’s opening moments. Which player can with the most precision pick the cage’s top corners? Whose shot carries so much sting that its riccochet returns the puck well out back into the skating slot? In my own warmups as a player I much never minded the misses on the pre-game net so long as they delivered that piercing crack against the plexi-glass; I figured it produced something for the netminder at the other end to think about.

The two teams take pains (most of the time) to respect the half-sheet territoriality of the skate, and this, too, adds an aura to the moment. Montreal’s Claude Lemieux precipitated perhaps the NHL’s most infamous pre-game brawl in the 1987 Eastern Conference finals versus Philadelphia. Lemieux liked to shoot a puck into the opposing net at the end of the warmup skate. The 1980s Flyers (Dave Brown, Rick Tocchet, Craig Berube, Scott Mellanby), as you might imagine, took none too kindly to this habit. On the night in question the Flyers even turned their cage around at the end of the skate to impede Lemieux. He outwaited them and fired away. Before it was all over, there were players brawling out on the ice in their socks and shower sandals.

Always there is a blood-warming soundtrack, too, to the prelude skate — carefully selected, generally hard rockin’ tracks that seem in synch with the high-octane mission ahead. From bantam to beer league to big league, loud rock music is a staple of player warmups. I’ve long meant to solicit from the beer league-ing among our readers their pre-game playlists and see what songs most commonly get cued up. Marilyn Manson a few years back seemed to offer up an anthem for eternity for hockey warm-ups in rinks across the globe:

I don’t want you and I don’t need you/ don’t bother to resist, I’ll beat you/ It’s not your fault that you’re always wrong/ the weak ones are there to justify the strong/ the beautiful people, the beautiful people

Whether I was 7 or 37 I never ceased to appreciate how thoroughly two NHL teams could chew up a 200-by-85 sheet of fresh ice with a mere 15 minutes of fluid labor. At 6:45 their snow-crusted sheet looks identical to the one inhabited for an hour by 200 Saturday public sessions skaters at the community rink.

I suppose my exposure to warm-up skates at old Capital Center was formative: it wasn’t just that I was young then but that the Pringle Chip’s seats were enveloped in such pervasive darkness, and so the shimmering white ice below that greeted the warm-up arrival, with so many players rushing about it helmetless, their era-appropriate long hair fluttering gallantly as their skate blades crunched and smacked pucks hissed, was hero-forming.

Warm-ups have changed a bit since then. They’re shorter now, it seems — 15 minutes instead of about 20. Also, slapshots have all but disappeared from them. I remember well the firing squad along the blueline pelting Al Jensen and Ron Low and Pete Peeters and Don Beaupre. I must have watched a thousand of these slapshots at the old barn before I turned 15, ever awestruck at their velocity and the nano-second of interlude between launches. Perhaps it’s because today’s sticks are so expensive, and the velocity they generate so significant, that slapshots have been removed from the routine. But it may also be the case that slapshots have dissipated greatly in games in general, as the time and space they require have vanquished — so players simply are warming up with the shots they most commonly use in games.

NHLers, all, were themselves at one time the wide-eyed, nose-pressed-against-the-plexi-glassers, and it isn’t uncommon to see players today toss a puck up over the glass or even bestow an underperforming (nonetheless still expensive) stick to a lucky youth at the end of these warm-up minutes. More common are the winks and smiles players perched next to the glass will direct at their young admirers on the other side. Eras change in hockey, but the sport’s elite continue to connect with their core constituents in this special slice of time.

Son of Slap Shot

Son of a Hanson brother winning an award for sportsmanship? It’s true:

Shall We Dance?

A little weekend humor for you (or “humour” since both play for Canadian teams). Aaron Downey and Brad Norton, you’re the next contestants on Dancing with the Stars!

YouTube Preview Image

Radio Somewhere, Special, on a Special Saturday Night

Morning Cup-A-JoeHoliday partying during Saturday’s you’re-a-dolt-if-you-missed-that-one in Ottawa, I managed to catch Jonathon Warner’s post-game ebullience on 3WT making my way home, and thereby felt as if I hadn’t missed a thing. Confession: I’ve done a terribly poor job of touting Jonathon’s talents, both with his “Saturday Night Caps” program and his superb post-game roundup. This is all the more unforgivable in light of the fact that Jonathon was gracious enough to invite Eric McErlain and me on his Saturday show earlier in the season.

At one point during the post-game show last night Jonathon had Nicklas Backstrom on the phone from the Scotiabank visitor’s room, and at the end of the exchange Jonathon told his listeners, “You could just hear Backstrom’s smile [on the call].” Great radio personalities showcase an empathy with their guests and listeners, and this Jonathon regularly does, most particularly with his callers.  

A game like last night’s makes fans want to reach out and connect with the rest of the supporting community, in something more personal than message boards, and a program like Jonathon’s allows precisely that. Perhaps a figure like Jonathon suffers from commerical radio’s larger decline the past decade-plus, but if the Caps make a notable push in the standings in the season’s second half, Caps’ fans are going to want to hitch a ride on this radio program. Bruce Springsteen has a catchy little diddy out these days titled, ‘Radio Nowhere,’ but last night, listening to Jonathon’s program, I felt like I was lodged in Radio Somewhere Warm, Informative, and Fun.

I was Blackberried during the Saturday night family holiday gathering, and the required 36 or 38 third-period updates I could have done without. But once home, I was able to have every goal, and some other notable plays, replayed for me by visiting the Caps’ home page and streaming the video highlights found in the game recap box. I hadn’t been in a position this season to need that before, but now I appreciate it.

Donald Brashear’s now legendary maiming of Chris Neil, however, was not included in the package. I’m going to have to ask the Caps’ communications folks about either the oversight or some more sinister reason for excluding it. I mean, it’s Christmas time.

From my chum Marleen this morning I received not only a faithful blow-by-blow summary of the slow dance — “Brash uncorked 18 straight haymakers on Neil’s head . . . the announcers claimed just 15, but I counted, rewound the Tivo and slow-motion counted, and it was 18 glorious noggin-knockers” — but a powerful sense of my needing to make the YouTube retrieval of this medieval deathmatch my Sunday obligation. It took a bit of digging, but oh was it ever worth the effort, and now it’s recorded, as it should be, forever for posterity at OFB.

YouTube Preview Image 

JoeB, previously noted appropriately for his astute call of Alex the Gr8’s greatest-ever goal in Phoenix his rookie year, rises again to the occasion in Scotiabank Saturday night.

“Oh my goodness . . . gracious . . . Chris [Neil] go down already.

“Chris Neil ate about 15 [Donald Brashear] lefts.”

We can forgive JoeB, during all that excitement, for not fact-checking the fist-throw count with Marleen in real time.  

Tarik’s lead this morning, I thought, was letter-perfect:

“If Alex Ovechkin was less than 100 percent because of stitches in his thigh, it wasn’t evident Saturday night against the Ottawa Senators.”

One might have attributed last month’s 4-1 triumph in Ottawa to the Sens taking the then victory-starved Caps lightly, but what now? Tuesday’s third matchup of the season between the teams will tell us a lot, I think, about the sort of mettle Bruce Boudreau’s players will take into the season’s second half, for they’ll host one ornery Sens’ squad in a late matinee then. But win or lose Tuesday, the Caps have already delivered an interesting potential storyline between these clubs. If — if — the Caps could somehow scratch and claw their way into the East’s eighth spot at season’s end, they’d very likely face the Sens in the postseason’s first round. And regular season MoJo between clubs often influences playoff karma. An interesting, thought, no?    

I could get used to these kind of winter-time Sunday mornings.

 

 

In Beantown, Halloween on Ice

You know how one out of every 125 or so NHL fights reminds you, by virtue of their jaw-dropping, scare-the-dog-with-your-shrieks reactions to their violence, of their genuinely frightening, game-altering authenticity? One of those just transpired in Boston, where 6 ‘9, 251-lb. Zdeno Chara made mincemeat of 6 ‘6, 238-lb. Blackhawk David Koci. It was positively a Halloween scene . . . as in straight out of the movie ‘Halloween.’ Splatters of Koci blood — something out of Showtime’s ‘Dexter‘ — filled the center of a faceoff circle. Koci, the game’s announcers just informed, endured a broken nose two games ago. It was harrowing seeing him attempt to cling to Chara’s jersey with his left arm while trying to maintain a safe, face-preserving distance from Chara’s disfiguring blows.

Incredibly, it was Chara’s first fight as a Bruin. As tape of it is watched around the league, you’d think he won’t be on the receiving end of many challenges in the near future.

We will update this file with video just as soon as we locate it.

Update: Thanks to Sig for the pointer to the video.

YouTube Preview Image

Helping Hockey Players Help Themselves

James Surowiecki, writer for The New Yorker’s Financial Page, recently ruminated on the current Congressional debate on a bill to raise automotive fuel economy standards. The article, while brief by New Yorker standards (then again, so is Gone with the Wind), makes for a very intriguing read.

Clearly a discussion about fuel economy legislation is better left to the political arena; but Surowiecki referenced an example to illustrate his point that you may find as interesting as I did:

Back in the nineteen-seventies, an economist named Thomas Schelling, who later won the Nobel Prize, noticed something peculiar about the NHL. At the time, players were allowed, but not required, to wear helmets, and most players chose to go helmet-less, despite the risk of severe head trauma.

But when they were asked in secret ballots most players also said that the league should require them to wear helmets. The reason for this conflict, Schelling explained, was that not wearing a helmet conferred a slight advantage on the ice; it gave the player better peripheral vision, and it also made him look fearless. The players wanted to have their heads protected, but as individuals they couldn’t afford to jeopardize their effectiveness on the ice.

Making helmets compulsory eliminated the dilemma: the players could protect their heads without suffering a competitive disadvantage. Without the rule, the players’ individually rational decisions added up to a collectively irrational result. With the rule, the outcome was closer to what players really wanted.

Ovechkin's visor doesn't seem to bother him - photo by Mike RuckiSurowiecki goes on to posit, “In calling for a law requiring better gas mileage in our cars, then, voters are really saying that they’re unhappy with the collective result of the choices they make as buyers. Sometimes, they know, we need to save ourselves from ourselves.”

Besides being an interesting debate in and of itself, it got me thinking about the NHL dilemma regarding face protection. Visors, a.k.a. half-shields, are currently optional in the National Hockey League. In 2004, approximately 35% of NHL players wore visors. [1] Like the helmet-optional days of yore, many players choose to forgo safety in favor of a slight competitive advantage — though with top-notch players like Alex Ovechkin and Sidney Crosby wearing visors, one might understandably wonder if the “advantage” is more perception than reality. Regardless, a majority of current NHL players still go visor-free–a situation that sounds remarkably similar to the 1970s’ helmet debate.

The half-shield issue rears its head each time a player is injured in a way that a visor could have prevented . . . and it’s a surprisingly long injury list, including Saku Koivu, Dany Heatley, Owen Nolan, Bryan Berard, and Steve Yzerman to name a few prominent examples.

Even the great Stevie Y, a tough-as-nails player by any reckoning, had a change of heart after his injury:

Yzerman, when talking to reporters days after his injury in the 2004 playoffs, had changed his opinion on visors.

“Sitting in the hospital that night, I really wished I’d been wearing a visor,” Yzerman said. “I played 21 years and never had an eye injury. My cheekbone didn’t really hurt at the time. The first thing that went through my mind was, ‘I don’t want to lose my eyesight.’ I really believe guys should be wearing them. I didn’t say that (a week before the injury occurred).”

Yzerman said that he would support the idea of mandatory visors. He added that he had no trouble adjusting to the visor. [2]

Unfortunately it is human nature to have difficulty embracing lessons learned by others. It took a personally-sustained injury for Yzerman and many others to realize that the return-on-investment of wearing a visor makes it a smart investment indeed.

Mats Sundin Injury - Dave Sandford/Getty ImagesSpeaking of investment, visors protect more than the players who wear them. Owners pay millions of dollars to bring the right players to a team; coaches and GMs spend countless hours on plans based around those players; fans invest hard-earned money to see those players, not to mention fans’ emotional connection to their team’s success. Donning a half-shield seems a small inconvenience with a potentially huge payoff that benefits more than just the player.

Now I am a fan of hockey pugilism–proper fighting (not cowardly hits from behind, elbows, and the like) has a place in the game. Regardless of where one stands on the fighting debate, visors need not impact fighting at all; when two players drop the gloves, they can simply drop the helmet as well. Not only would it make the moment as two players square off even more dramatic, but it would also reduce hand injuries from punching an opponent’s helmet. And if a player is unwilling to remove his helmet for a fight, well, perhaps he should just turtle and not be fighting in the first place.

Companies like ITECH and Oakley now boast optically-correct visors that are practically bulletproof, thus significantly reducing the one player complaint that seemed to hold up to scrutiny: that visors made it more difficult to see. Clearly NHL teams would provide their players with the best visors available; thus players would be less likely to deal with the fogging/distortion issues plaguing pickup hockey players’ shields. Still, any fractional vision impediment caused by visors would be irrelevant if everyone wore them–and Yzerman, by his own admission, easily adjusted to playing with a half-shield after 21 years without one.

So the debate comes back to Surowiecki’s point in the New Yorker article: when individuals are incapable or unwilling to make smart decisions (whether due to a perceived or real competitive disadvantage, or just plain machismo) shouldn’t the relevant governing body to help protect the individual as well as the investment of others? Or, to put it in socio-economic terms, when the parties in a given market cease to operate as rational actors, shouldn’t the powers-that-be step in to correct the problem?

Whether it’s the automotive industry’s seat belts and safety glass, or the NHL’s helmets and visors, the answer is a resounding “Yes.”

Bloody Anniversary in Detroit

A bloody Patrick RoyTen years ago today, in Detroit, fans witnessed one of most brutal games in hockey history. 144 penalty minutes, a bloody goaltender fight (c.f. Patrick Roy’s dazed look), and the significant deepening of a great hockey rivalry between the Red Wings and Avalanche. Whether you are for or against fighting in the sport, that game was undeniably riveting.

We thank Thomas Neumann, ESPN Page 2 editor, for chronicling the anniversary of that historic donnybrook–in an ESPN article filled with great external links no less. Be sure to read the article here; it’s good stuff, and it’s heartening to see quality hockey content on ESPN.

Blaming the Messenger

cupajoe.jpegLikely we agree that the NHL has a pretty compelling product to pitch . . . particularly when relative to say, celebrity poker or the Professional Bowler’s Association or Pro Bass Fishing. It boasts world-class athletes who virtually to a man are an unrivaled blend of brawn, bravado, and sublime skill. Additionally, they commonly comport themselves as upstanding members of their communities; which is to say, their All Star Games, for instance, are seldom associated with spawning terrorism in large cities. In action, NHLers are showcased in perhaps sports’ most novel setting, walled and glassed in with no out of bounds escape. To quote the illustrious Ron Weber, “Welcome to the world’s fastest team sport!”

And yet, with so much greatness indigenous to its game, the NHL can be counted upon to come up Marty Turco short when it comes to Madison Avenue marketing.

It could fairly be said that the NHL does a terrible job of illustrating and mainstreaming its core product to the American public, if such a charge weren’t so serious a slander to “terrible.”

But why is the league so amateur and so ham-fisted in its marketing endeavors across the board? The answer may be in analogy: in the quest for a healthy share of the mighty purse offered by the American sports revenue landscape, the NHL ever steps into the ring with a twentysomething Mike Tyson physique and his stonebreaking fists and proceeds to try and sway the judges with intermittent scoring jabs. Season to season, it never seems to know if it’s a puncher or a jabber. And decades of split decisions ultimately land you on Versus.

My favorite bumper stickers are irreverent and clever, such as “My kid can beat up your honor roll student.” The NHL needs to be the revving Mustang with the non-working muffler grinding its gears down quiet Main Street bearing that bumper sticker. Not because it’s cool or hip or trendy to do so but because that’s its authentic ride. Once upon an Original Six time, the league was like this. Sadly, today, chauffeur Bettman and seemingly all his colleagues in the New York and Toronto offices prefer a Taurus.

To be fair, the NHL is confronted by a cultural quandary in North America that no other professional sport — including even NASCAR now — does: Canadians get it while 80-percent-plus of Americans do not. And yet, ironically enough, some of the most durable relationships between hockey and the American community occur south of the Mason Dixon, at the minor pro level. Texas, for instance, once had a minor pro league all of its own and today fields seven of the CHL’s 17 teams.

Understand, too, that the aim here isn’t to dislodge the NCAA hoops tournament from its Swiss Bank account perch; rather, contemporary professional hockey that features the young virtuosos that it does ought to be able to better the cooking channel numbers on Monday and Tuesday evenings. Even if the chefs are playing poker while the lasagna bakes.

[Timing in life is everything, and this morning The Onion has a riotously humorous mockery of the NHL's television plight up on its site, featuring the Commissioner announcing a new broadcast agreement with the Food Network.]

Last year Reebok promoted its new wonderkid, Sidney Crosby, with a 30-second television advertisement striking in its sparse production values but so compelling in its cumulative subtleties that it fairly ran on a loop on Versus and regional networks the entire season. I saw the spot perhaps 425 times last season, enjoying it as much in April as I did in October. It’s worth, I think, a reminding look:

YouTube Preview Image

Maybe the spot moves you like it did me, maybe it doesn’t. But is there any denying that Reebok unearthed an ageless essence of our grand game in a way the NHL seldom ever has? A few years ago, Mastercard gave us a similar “reverence of spirit” treatment in an ad that featured a boy and his father stomping through prairie snow toward a frozen playground, their sticks and skates hauled over their shoulders. These “postcard” impressions of hockey’s roots, searing in their splendor, have few rivals in sports; they ought to be fixtures in marketing campaigns.

Why is it that corporate America can at times magnificently honor hockey while the NHL most often profanes it? Remember the NHL ’s multi-million “Re-launch” ads of last season, proudly debuted by the Commissioner at some swanky New York restaurant for the press last autumn? Bare-chested, scar-free, shiny-and-authentic-toothed actors (as opposed to authentic hockey players), introduced by indecipherable Asian poetry and billed as warriors of some sort, were pre-game massaged to loud music by pinup tramps in unintentionally satirical excess. Good breeding and taste prevent me from YouTubing a sample for you here, but Bettman should have been impeached for authorizing those.

Shakespeare told us “To Thine Own Self Be True.” Hockey’s return to the sporting mainstream has its own salvation within, if only its leaders would recognize it.

Maxime Daigneault: Pugilist

Hershey Bears’ netminder Maxime Daigneault is the mild-mannered sort, but last night, when he found Binghamton Senators’ goalie Jeff Glass skating down to have a go, well, Daigneault decided to meet force with force.

Daigneault explained to Bears beat writer Tim Leone:

“He punched me first, so I had to punch him and keep going,” Daigneault said. “I have my glove on, so it’s tough to throw some lefts. But I just used my right and got him with a few punches. He got me once on the nose.

“I think his eye is a little bit bumped. It’s always fun. It’s part of the game. I don’t really like it, but it’s always fun and gets the crowd going and everything. I’m more proud of my game — one goal on 34 shots.”

YouTube Preview Image

Owner in a Skirt, City in Need of Sacking Up

With the devastating but clean hit Chris Neil put on Chris Drury last week and the responses it has occasioned from seemingly everybody in Buffalo — will the city’s Mayor next send a tear-stained letter to Gary Bettman? — we may be witnessing the most powerful case yet for Kansas City being awarded a hockey team. Just not Pittsburgh’s.

On Saturday Sabres’ owner Tom Golisano, informed that day by the NHL that his organization’s hand-wringing over a clean hit was baseless, took the unprecedented action of putting in writing his whining. Take a look:

Golisano Letter - Click for Larger Version

Particularly helpful, wasn’t it, for Golisano to outline for the commissioner the instances in which hitting in hockey is merited? Who knew? Note, though, that Golisano didn’t acknowledge hitting’s role in intimidating or changing the momentum of a hockey game . . . or perhaps even sending a message for the postseason . . . even though those have been a part of hockey since, say, its inception. (Bettman might have responded to the letter with his own asking “What’s with the slug in the letterhead?”) Golisano’s unseemly woe-is-my-team missive occurred fast on the heels of his coach’s meltdown before the media last week. The heaviness of hankies in upstate New York only continued to grow, however.

Saturday night Ottawa and Buffalo met again, and during an intermission the Ottawa Sun’s Bruce Garrioch fielded fresh sobs from a Buffalo broadcast crew. Imagine inviting a guest on the air to discuss a high-profile, highly controversial piece of communication and then, irritated by the guest’s defense of eons of hockey’s toughness and his calling out the coward who wrote it, dismissing those views by claiming “in fairness, you haven’t read [Golisano's] letter.” That’s precisely what the Buffalo broadcast crew did.

Garrioch accurately characterized the Golisano letter as “whining to a new level,” pointing out that last season, in the playoffs, Flyers’ owner Ed Snider never thought to bellyache to Bettman when his player, R.J. Umberger, was laid out in even more viscious fashion by Buffalo’s Brian Campbell. Here’s Garrioch the sensible in smackdown mode:

YouTube Preview Image

One can’t help but place the Sabres’ sullying of our sport this past week in the context of a battered wife syndrome for sports set off city-wide perhaps by Scott Norwood. And Brett Hull. More recently Alexander Ovechkin. And now Chris Neil. Buffalo has a terrific hockey climate, and some superbly skilled legacy. What it doesn’t have much of these days is heart and grit.

10 Questions for Ross Bernstein, Hockey Author and Fighting Expert

The Code - by Ross BernsteinHere’s hockey plasma for you: as a freshman at the University of Minnesota in the late 1980s, Ross Bernstein attempted to walk on to the Golden Gopher hockey team, and failing, channeled his puck passion into serving as the team mascot, Goldy the Gopher. The experience formed the basis of his 1992 book Gopher Hockey by the Hockey Gopher. Later he would author a keepsake not just for Minnesota hockey fans but really for all American hockey lovers: the exhaustive and richly illustrated Frozen Memories: Celebrating a Century of Minnesota Hockey. If you possess a scintilla of curiosity about how Minnesota became the State of Hockey, it belongs on your coffee table. The scope of research conducted in Frozen Memories is astounding, and that’s become a staple of Bernstein’s sportswriting career.

His latest effort is the culmination of two years of interviews with more than 100 NHL enforcers, active and retired, coaches, and managers, on and off the record, titled The Code: The Unwritten Rules of Fighting and Retaliation in the NHL. It’s an unprecedented insider’s chronicle of the history of fighting in hockey, with Bernstein gaining access to insights into the super-shrouded, most often unspoken world of hockey’s honor and intimidation system.

When we chatted last week Bernstein informed me that he was working on an update of Frozen Memories, to be completed perhaps by year’s end, as so much has happened in Minnesota hockey since its publication. I mentioned my interest in the U.S. Pond Hockey Championships and the novelty of schoolboy games being contested outdoors on ponds and lakes in the land of 10,000 lakes, and Bernstein confirmed that those events were among the targets of his updated book. But after that, we got to talking about brawling — big time, bare-knuckled brawling — and an hour went by before I’d asked him half of the questions I wanted to. Passionate puckheads are a warm meal on a winter’s night delight to talk to; passionate puckhead authors, I learned, are tiramisu.

pucksandbooks: Hockey’s rules, styles and strategems, even its source cultures have evolved so dramatically over the past 25 years. How do you explain fighting’s enduring role at both the minor and big-league levels of the sport?

Ross Bernstein: In doing the book, I tracked the history — 150 years — of violence in hockey. Violence has been a part of hockey since day one; it’s always just been part of the culture. Actually, it was way worse once upon a time. You had stick fighting. Toe Blake. In the last 25 years it’s evolved a lot, and I point to the Broad Street Bullies as the turning point. 1987 was the last year we had a bench-clearing brawl in the NHL — the penalty became too steep. My book chronicles this evolution. Fighting’s down 37 percent post-lockout. You notice Tie Domi retiring as quietly as he did. The goons are gone. Guys today gotta be able to skate, to take a shift. Having said that, hockey remains a game of fear and intimidation. You have to carry your head on a swivel. It’s not like football where guys are wearing a mask — it’s a totally different game. Fighting has always been a part of it.

Expansion also played a key part in perpetuating fighting’s legacy. Fighting was made more prevalent to sell the game. I’m talking about regions where the kids don’t play the game; fighting became a selling point there. What if NASCAR said, ‘We’re eliminating crashing?’ But the way I’d put it is, fighting isn’t as gratuitous in the new NHL.

pucksandbooks: My father and I have had a 25-year disagreement about fighting in hockey. He hates it, thinks it’s a nuissance that harms the sport’s overall appeal. He’d outlaw it yesterday if he were made commissioner tomorrow. I on the other hand see it as altogether organic or indigenous — an extension of the sport’s rugged checking, and a byproduct of the novelty that is racing a round a playing surface at upwards of 30 mph while wielding a weapon. Which one of us is right? Continue reading ›