23 April, 2014


Can the Capitals Replicate Last Year’s Penalty Kill Success?

There was one undeniable bright spot throughout the roller coaster that was the Washington Capitals’ season last year: the team’s penalty kill, which jumped from 25th the previous season to 2nd in the entire NHL in 2010-2011.

Capitals’ Assistant Coach Dean Evason identified three factors when talking with OFB about what made that jump possible for the Capitals:  personnel, tweaks to the system, and goaltending.

“First and foremost, our goaltending was really good,” Evason said. “Your goaltender has to be your best penalty killer. And our goaltenders were our best penalty killers last year.”

Ironically, the best save percentage in shorthand situations last season belonged to AHL callup Braden Holtby, who faced 52 shots while the Capitals were shorthanded and stopped all but 3 of them.  Semyon Varlamov had a.892 save % shorthanded, while Michal Neuvirth was  lower at .885 (37th in the league).

Meanwhile, in front of the net, the system altered. Evason said the Capitals tweaked their approach in shorthanded situations to be “really aggressive–to force teams to make great plays, make three, four perfect passes to beat us.” Their philosophy now is to put as much pressure as they can on the opponent.

He also said that past few years have helped the Capitals figure out personnel and who can play best shorthanded.

“We were kind of going through a learning phase the last few years with people,” Evason said. “And now we know who’s good penalty killers and who aren’t. We’ve got people in those roles.”

According to Evason, Caps fans should see at least one noticeable adjustment  on the penalty kill this year: slightly  limited time for Nicklas Backstrom and Alexander Semin, not because of poor performance, but in order to free them up offensively.  Since Evason feels there are about 10 forwards on the current Capitals roster that can play the penalty kill, it’s not as necessary for Backstrom to rack up shorthanded minutes . Last season alone, Backstrom played 111 minutes while the Capitals were shorthanded, the most of any forward on the team except for Brooks Laich and Boyd Gordon.  Semin had over 60 minutes of penalty killing time, which was actually slightly below his 2009-2010 totals.

One big loss this season is Scott Hannon, who had the most penalty kill minutes of anyone on the team last year, and whom Evason mentions by name when talking about the success of last year’s PK unit. Eight of the top 10 players in shorthand time on ice from last season, however, have returned to the Capitals this season. Plus, they’ve added players like Troy Brouwer and Joel Ward.

Despite Hannon’s absence, Evason believes the Caps  are incredibly deep in guys who can play on the penalty kill—so deep, in fact, that there’s a chance guys not committed enough to the situation will end up watching it from the bench.

The Personnel on the PK Unit

There’s a solid list of traits an NHLer needs to be a good penalty killer. Work ethic. Stick skills to eliminate passing lanes. A commitment to blocking shots.

“Not a lot of guys have that commitment to block shots,” Evason said.

But for those who can penalty kill, the role is a double-edged sword: it’s physically painful to play, but it may be just as painful to be stuck watching on the bench.

Brooks Laich, who leads the team in shorthanded ice time so far this season, calls penalty killing the “underbelly of hockey.”

“You’re out there against the team’s best players, with one less guy on the ice for yourself. You’re expected to block shots and passes, and cover two guys at once,” Laich told OFB.

In fact, he laughs when asked if he prefers playing on the penalty kill or the power play.

“Power play, all the way. The penalty kill sucks,” said Laich, who was 29th overall in the league  among forwards in shorthanded minutes played  last season. “I don’t enjoy it, but if I was left on the bench and the penalty kill was going on, I’d be probably upset, I’d be mad, because I’d want to be out there to try to kill it off, because I believe it’s a really important part of the game.”

Despite the bruises, broken body parts and other assorted disasters that come with the job, it’s also a privilege, and the depth of the Capitals’ roster means those who don’t take it seriously could easily find themselves without the ice time.

“We told the guys right from the start that we have so many penalty killers that if you don’t get the job done, you don’t kill,” Evason said. “Guys want to kill penalties because they’re on the ice, they’re in the game, their ice time [goes up] … we want guys that are committed to kill penalties to help us win the hockey game.”

Going Forward

This year, two games into the season, the Capitals are 23rd  in the league in penalty killing. They’ve been shorthanded 8 times and given up 2 goals. But there was improvement even in that 72-hour stretch: the only goals they gave up were in Game 1, despite six of the penalty kills coming in Game 2.  And new goalie Tomas Vokoun, despite his underwhelming debut in Game 2, is coming off a stellar performance in shorthanded situations last year, where he had a .968 save percentage. Also, as Evason noted, the Capitals have enough qualified personnel on their roster that an ineffective penalty killer will soon find himself on the bench.

So while the number of guys on the ice might say the team is shorthanded, it sounds like the Capitals feel they’re anything but.

 

 

 

 

 



4 Comments

  1. Ralph wrote:

    “Ironically, the best save percentage in shorthand situations last season belonged to AHL callup Braden Holtby, who faced only nine shots while the Capitals were shorthanded and stopped all of them. Semyon Varlamov had a.944 save % shorthanded, while Michal Neuvirth was much lower at .879 (61st in the league).”

    NHL.com is weird in that “shorthanded” save percentage there is when the other team is shorthanded (the Caps are on the PP). You need to be looking at the Power Play Save Percentage column. Varlamov was .892 on 130 shots, Neuvirth .885 on 226 shots, and Holtby .942 on 52 shots. All of those numbers are well above average to my knowledge.

    13 October, 2011 at 7:39 am | Permalink
  2. Rob wrote:

    This is pretty surprising to me. When I played, penalty kill was always my favorite part. Obviously it wasn’t near the same level as these guys… but playing in the most difficult situation you possibly could and coming out of it successfully was incredibly satisfying (killing a long 5 on 3 is the most fun I could’ve had back in high school).

    13 October, 2011 at 10:25 am | Permalink
  3. Hmm interesting stuff. I didn’t realize that the Caps PK was 2nd overall last year. That is very impresive. I think more needs to be made about the Caps PP…they are going to have to be better this year. Be sure to check out my Game 3 preview @ http://districtredzone.blogspot.com/2011/10/game-3-preview-pittsburgh-penguins.html

    13 October, 2011 at 10:41 am | Permalink
  4. Ralph, you are completely right –sorry for my mistake — I had several spreadsheets pulled up of teams and individuals for the story and clearly looked at the wrong one, thinking team shorthanded shots against and not goalie when glancing at the numbers. I corrected the numbers in the story. Thanks for noticing.
    Rob — I agree what Brooks said was surprising! I definitely didn’t expect him to answer like he did. But he was very adamant in his PK comments, so I thought it was an interesting perspective to present. I know he takes a lot of satisfaction in being on the ice and his blue collar approach, so it was fascinating to hear how he really wasn’t crazy about the PK and how focused he was on the physical toll it took. He told me that if the Caps go the whole night without a PK, he’s a happy man (the context was in the sense of what he prefers playing rather than it being better for the team in general to not be on the PK).

    13 October, 2011 at 7:26 pm | Permalink