24 April, 2014


Maybe . . . Just Maybe . . . NBC Wishes It Had Run Hockey Last Night

Before we address last night’s U.S.-Canada showdown, a word of hello from the Capitals’ captain to the former Capitals’ quitter, at Olympic center ice, in Super Sunday’s first big game:

Can’t watch that too often, can we? The only way to improve on that Marlboro Man moment would have been if Jagr were still dating a model and Ovi left the rink with her yesterday. Maybe he did.

What a morning to be discussing a monumental triumph by an American hockey team at the Olympics — today of course is the 30th anniversary of the Miracle on Ice. Speaking of the Miracle, it was bizarre to see NBC (Nothing But Curling) run a 30-minute, spectacularly well produced feature on it, hosted by Al Michaels, less than two hours before Team USA faced off against Canada in the most highly anticipated international hockey game in years, only to jettison the broadcast of the game to its hinterland cable partner, MSNBC. Just bizarre.

It was also bizarre to see NBC News treat last night’s game as a mega-event a mere 30 minutes before puck-drop. The game and its fevered anticipation led the very top of the 7:00 NBC Evening News. And on the home page for NBC’s Olympics coverage yesterday afternoon, this headline: “It’s hockey night in Vancouver.” Just bizarre.

If NBC is doing anything right with its hockey coverage of these Games it’s their generously including the analyses and reminiscences of various members of the Miracle on Ice team. Last night Mike Eruzione said of this American Olympics entry: “They’re not a team built on superstars, they’re built on character.” Rizzo knows of what he speaks.

A not so superfluous fashion note: the Americans last night honored our 1960 gold medal winning Olympic team by wearing replicas of their Squaw Valley sweater. Were they gorgeous or what? The last American Olympic hockey team that looked that good was our 1980 squad. This sweater should never ever be replaced so long as the United States fields a hockey team in the Olympics — or in any other international competition, for that matter. Other nations have sent their national teams out in a durable look over decades of competition, and what the Yanks wore last night seemed as natural and classic and durable as Yankee pinstripes.

There’s a powerful moment in ‘Forgotten Miracle’ when American head coach Jack Riley, speaking of his team’s startling upset of Canada at Squaw Valley, says of his goaltender, Jack McCartan, “No goalie ever played as well as McCartan played that night.” Jack Riley no doubt was watching last night’s game, and if he wasn’t ready to acknowledge Ryan Miller’s playing the best game an American goalie ever has in the Olympics — 42 saves of 45 Canadian shots, many of them of the high, high quality variety — we bet he might put Miller’s effort at a 1B to McCartan’s 1A.

Canada of course badly outshot the U.S., 45 to 23, and thoroughly controlled the first two periods of play. But the Americans for once had the better netminder, and they managed to out-physical the big Canadians. The Americans utilized their strong team speed to create an effective forecheck, which caused numerous turnovers by Canadian rearguards, particularly in the first period. American forecheckers had Canada rattled enough in their own end that Martin Brodeur may have developed distrust in his defenders; how else to explain his outlandishly poor judgment in attempting to fungo bat a puck out of his own end and onto the blade of Brian Rafalski, who subsequently put it in the back of the Canadian cage.

Has there been a better player in this tournament thus far than Rafalski?

The Americans played a disciplined game — they were whistled for a lone infraction through the game’s first 40 minutes. As much puck possession as Canada enjoyed, imagine if they’d had more ice and shooting lanes to work with in those first two periods. Excessive penalty killing necessarily carries a wearying effect, and in Sunday night’s final frantic minutes, when the Canadians sustained pressure in the offensive zone as if the Americans were defending without sticks, the Americans had lively legs, effectively getting into many shooting lanes and battling beautifully for loose pucks.

Did we say battling beautifully for loose pucks? Ryan Kesler’s empty net effort was iconic. A tally for American hockey lore. Like John Carlson’s last month.

The selection of Chris Drury for this American Olympic team occasioned no small volume of second guessing/criticism, but all of that has quickly silenced with his play through the first three games for the Americans. Already we are hearing commentators and analysts heap praise on Brian Burke and his American general manager brain-trust for assembling not the most talented group of Americans but “the right group.” A character group. When did you last hear that said of an American hockey entry at an Olympics? And how did they turn out? Just sayin. Incidentally, we’ve seen nowhere near the best from impact players Zach Parise, Patrick Kane, and Phil Kessel.

Speaking of Brian Burke, his agony this month — he lost his 21-year-old son Brendan in a car accident in snowy Indiana on February 5 — is unimaginable; may he and his family have found a few hours of respite in last night’s celebratory postgame.

Another sage observation from ‘Forgotten Miracle’: “A hot goalie at the right time can make the difference between a mediocre team and an Olympic gold medal victory team.”

Hey, so who won the ice dancing competition anyway?



15 Comments

  1. Victor wrote:

    The selection of Chris Drury for this American Olympic team occasioned no small volume of second guessing/criticism…
    As is, I’m sure, the exclusion of Mike Green from Team Canada. I think there would have been a different outcome had Greenie been on the ice during the Canadian PP.

    22 February, 2010 at 5:29 am | Permalink
  2. I dopn’t know about y’all but I also noted that the Canadians were outscored by a Defenseman after leaving Mike Green off their roster…. total foolishness to leave a guy who is and has clearly been one of the 5 best defensemen in the NHL the past two seasons off their roster….

    22 February, 2010 at 10:17 am | Permalink
  3. Sonja wrote:

    Something I’ve noticed as well. The other teams are having fun. They seem to be thoroughly enjoying their Olympic experience, as well as playing really hard hockey. Team Canada? Not so much. They take the ice in grim, determined fashion with no joy on their faces. I’d hate to be on that team … what a grey and dreary tournament this must be for them.

    And … yep … last night’s game could have ended entirely differently if Mike Green had been playing in a red sweater. But we’ll never know now, will we?

    22 February, 2010 at 11:20 am | Permalink
  4. Jim T wrote:

    Canada actually suffered a double whammy yesterday. Not only did they get there hearts yanked out by the Americans (of all people) but the Canadian government closed all the private liquor stores due to the overwhelming amounts of public intoxication. So not only did Canadians get pimp slapped with a loss but they could not drown their sorrows in a beer. That has got to suck!

    22 February, 2010 at 11:37 am | Permalink
  5. The Friar wrote:

    Yikes. Way to leave your feet, or at least your heels, making that hit, Alex. Watch out for doing that when you get back to the League.

    22 February, 2010 at 11:52 am | Permalink
  6. Matt wrote:

    @The Friar

    What are you talking about? His stride was perfect into planting Jagr. The feet don’t even leave the ground until after the impact of the hit.

    Shoulder on head down, that’s as clean of an open ice hit as you’ll see.

    22 February, 2010 at 1:01 pm | Permalink
  7. Matt,

    You’re exactly right — Ovi’s was a textbook hit, the cleaniless of which, despite its sagavery, was illustrated by Jagr’s recovery from it. Shoulder on a skater with his head down. It occurred in center ice with all on-ice officials, and much of the hockey world, watching. Our commenting Friar here has been in the monastery too long. Reminded me of a Scott Stevens blowup brutality on Lindros.

    22 February, 2010 at 1:19 pm | Permalink
  8. Bart wrote:

    Re: NBCurling. Why on earth, when a team has the “hammer” and no rocks are on the target, does the team shoot so hard as to overshoot the target, thereby refusing to make a point? And why don’t the idiots commenting explain this whenever it happens?

    22 February, 2010 at 8:12 pm | Permalink
  9. @ BART: From what little I understand of Curling, the reason teams overshoot like that is because, if you score a point, the “hammer” transfers to your opponent for the next end. In other words, it’s not worth losing the last-rock advantage unless you can score two or more points in an end.

    22 February, 2010 at 8:57 pm | Permalink
  10. odessa steps magazine wrote:

    23.3 million Americans watched Ice Dancing on NBC last night.
    8.2 million Americans watched USA vs Canada on MSNBC last night.

    I think NBC made the right decision for ratings. I happily watched the game on MSNBC, free of up close and personal promos and Bob Costas and Al Michaels.

    22 February, 2010 at 10:47 pm | Permalink
  11. Bart wrote:

    Thanks, Mike, but in my example the team who purposely overshoots at the end of an end HAS the hammer and so it would transfer to the other team anyway, right? But you are right that there must be a reason for this odd behavior.

    23 February, 2010 at 8:08 am | Permalink
  12. @ BART: Again, I’m reaching here, but: if you *have* the hammer, I believe the only way you lose it is if you score a point. Each end that is scoreless (or if your opponent scores and you don’t), you get to keep the hammer for the next end. You could have the hammer the whole game if you never score.

    The fact that I know these things clearly indicates too much curling being broadcast these Olympics. :)

    23 February, 2010 at 8:14 am | Permalink
  13. Sonja wrote:

    @Bart and @OrderedChaos – if you blank (that is do not score) or score two points the hammer remains with the team who has it for the next end. If the team who has the hammer scores one point, then the hammer changes. The strategic end is the 8th end. Each team wants to get the hammer in the 8th end so that they may retain it for the 10th end and hopefully have a better chance to win the game.

    Yes, there’s been a lot of curling on. However … there’s a lot of strategy involved and when hockey’s not on, it’s a good substitute.

    23 February, 2010 at 9:31 am | Permalink
  14. Bart wrote:

    Thanks, Sonja; one of my errors was thinking that the hammer alternated on each end regardless.

    Each stone is thrown with some curl. Is that mandatory?

    23 February, 2010 at 12:23 pm | Permalink
  15. Sonja wrote:

    I don’t think a “curl” is mandatory with each throw. I’m watching the US women play China right now and just saw a very straight throw because that’s what was necessary for that rock. But … I am still very much learning all the strategy involved and am just one or maybe two steps ahead. ;-)

    23 February, 2010 at 2:02 pm | Permalink

One Trackback/Pingback

  1. [...] Ovechkin’s hit on Jaromir Jagr in yesterday’s Russia-Czech Republic game is another for the Ovi highlight reel; too bad NBC missed it. [Japers' Rink] [...]