21 March, 2010


At Long Last, Are the Local Media Gloves Off for the Danny?

Cup'pa JoeThis morning the Washington Post’s Thomas Boswell, whose journalistic integrity has never allowed him to emulate his local sports media peers in their collective suck-up-the-the-Skins ethos, begins his vivisection of Daniel Snyder’s Redskins thusly: “What have we done to deserve this?”

 

Boz is asking, rightly: What have we Washingtonians done to deserve the sickening stewardship of Snyder, which is fast establishing a record for infamy? And his question is skillfully offered in the context of Washington’s unseemly status as home to a century’s worth of wretched sports team owners.

 

Of Snyder’s La Cosa Nostra approach to extracting dough from the team’s faithful fans, in an economy nearly as sinister as the Great Depression, Boz observes: “If ticket buyers with multiyear contracts suffer from economic hard times, the Redskins do not emulate at least nine other NFL teams, as well as local franchises such as the Capitals, and simply cancel the tickets and sell them to someone else. Nope. Despite a “waiting list” they claim is 160,000 long, the Redskins sue some of their own fans for the money and, at times, even resell the tickets.”

 

Boz goes on to acknowledge that it is within the team’s legal right to aggressively enforce the terms of ticket contracts they enter into with their fans, “But that doesn’t make it right,” he adds. “No wonder there are few rebukes in this town as insulting as ‘That sounds like something Dan Snyder might do,’” he carves.  
 

In his surgical strike Boz should have included the infamous tag-team of Pollin and O’Malley and their reign of Errror-Terror over the Caps, but his work this morning offers I think, potentially, a revolutionary moment: As Washington better embraces the one-time sports stepchild Capitals, is local media concurrently reorientring its coverage — not just along a winner’s bandwagon sensibility but one of, dare I say it, morals and integrity? And accountability?     

 

On Wednesday morning, when I first encountered James Grimaldi’s ticket scandal expose-opener, I did a bit of a head-shake and lurched for smelling salt: did the Post really just run a 5,000-word critique of the Skins on A1? When Grimaldi went back at it on Thursday, complete with an above-the-fold color photo of a 72-year-old, near bankruptcy grandmother being sued by the Skins, I made an appointment with my primary care doc — “Overnight I’m pretty sure I died and went to heaven,” I told the office nurse taking my call.

 

[Video of Grimaldi discussing his scandal series on local TV can be found here.]

 

From whence sprung such no-hold-barred investigatory efforts, directed at the Big Sports Heavy in town — heretofore a sacred cow among the city’s sports scribes? Don’t know, don’t care. The more important question is: what if it isn’t a fleeting instance of old school journalists doing their jobs, and what if more such were to follow, and there was a broadening context within which the Capitals’ competitive standing and management practices were offered up as alternative?          

 

Of course there isn’t hope to be found at “ESPN[Redskins.com] 980,” the former WTEM, and Comcast is disspiritingly gorging back at the Hogs’ trough around the clock, the best scandal in this town since an intern’s blue dress acknowledged in conspicuously muted volume (a blog entry at the outlet’s site offers a summary of the scandal and Ivan Carter’s ‘WaPost Live’ treatment). But Comcast’s partnership with the Post offers hope still for some echo effect for this story and, more importantly, local media being emboldened by the big paper’s work this week. Will other outlets develop coverage testes when it comes to the Skins?

 

Baby steps, I guess, for now in the unexpected media revolution.   

 

On the grounds of good taste I’ve resisted narrating this story, told to me last year by a  member of the local MSM, but in the current cathartic climate it strikes me as a fitting coda to this file. In late September 2003 the football scribes were out at Redskin Park when word of Dany Heatley’s tragic car crash broke. Heatley of course lost teammate Dan Snyder in the wreck. This reporter, who was at Redskin Park then, swore to me that the press reaction to the news was “celebratory.” There were smiles and high-fives. They thought the other Snyder had passed, you see.  



5 Comments

  1. Birdie wrote:

    Bos also ripped into Snyder and the Redskins during his chat yesterday, where he also made sure to praise Ted’s ownership.

    4 September, 2009 at 2:02 pm | Permalink
  2. radio guy wrote:

    ESPN980s call letters are still WTEM.

    4 September, 2009 at 3:14 pm | Permalink
  3. Joe T. wrote:

    I think you should have continued to resist using the Heatley anecdote which– you’re right– is in poor taste. It ruined an otherwise decent piece. I also think that the story itself has to be apocryphal. What sort of football writer would really think that team owner Snyder was in the inebriated Dany Heatley’s car? That paragraph was a fur piece below the usual high quality of this blog.

    4 September, 2009 at 6:27 pm | Permalink
  4. dmg wrote:

    I agree that the anecdote is very likely an urban legend or a poor attempt at humor. In addition to the extreme implausibility of anyone thinking Dan Synder (Redkins owner) would be in a car with Dany Heatley in Atlanta barely more than 24 hours after a Redskins game in the middle of the season the facts simply don’t like up.
    The Heatley/Snyder (Thrashers) crash happened in the evening of September 29th and Snyder passed on October 5th. Ergo this story can’t have happened on the 30th because Snyder was still alive; additionally word of the story broke 9/29 at 10-11 PM ET, 10-12 hours before anyone would have been at Redskins Park, making learning of the news at that point unlikely (though I guess still possible).
    The story also could not have happened as a reaction to Snyder’s death. Synder died on October 5th, a Sunday where the Redkins were in Philadelphia playing the Eagles; thus neither the team nor the media would have been at Redskins Park. Plus, by that point, it would have been well established that the Dan Snyder who was in the accident with Heatley was not the Dan Snyder who owns the Redskins.

    5 September, 2009 at 12:18 pm | Permalink
  5. Paul wrote:

    I love how it says this beyond the comment field: “Please refrain from profanity and personal attacks.”
    Apparently that doesn’t extend to the site itself.

    5 September, 2009 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*

© 2006-2010 On Frozen Blog All Rights Reserved