Comments on: Out in the Heartland, a Rivalry Reborn

By: Real1

Real1 — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:38:52 +0000

First, the puckcarrier must have possesion which Havlat didn’t have.The hit even though textbook, was illegal.However,the penalties were too harsh a double minor at most, the game misconduct was very thin.Mule, you must be an novice to the game,3 OT games where the game could go either way is hardly a bump in the road.Chicago will beat the Redwings in next years final without Crosby we dont need him.

By: Grooven

Grooven — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 03:53:55 +0000

Photo looks like a video game

By: Junior

Junior — Sat, 30 May 2009 14:39:08 +0000

That photo is awesome, and I thought the same thing – it looks original six.

By: SpartyCuse

SpartyCuse — Fri, 29 May 2009 23:36:10 +0000

There was no “We Want Detroit” at the UC as the Hawks closed out Vancouver. It was “Detriot Sucks”

By: Matt

Matt — Fri, 29 May 2009 16:59:09 +0000

Yea – where is the credit for the photo? Its crap to pull something and not give credit.

By: pepper

pepper — Fri, 29 May 2009 15:28:28 +0000

Who took that fantastic photo – no credit?
The lighting and shadows are classic – brings it right back to the Original Six days.

By: The Mule

The Mule — Fri, 29 May 2009 13:06:10 +0000

YAAAAWN…Renewed rivalry? Perhaps if the Blackheads actually managed to be anyhting but a bump in the road. Until then, not so much. And can we please dispense with this “was it clean or dirty” BS? The hit was CLEAN. End of story. No discussion. The puck was there, Kronwall didn’t leave his feet, and he led with his shoulder. The Hawks are embarassing themselves even whining about it. Perhaps in 4 years when Crosby’s contract is up he can play for them. He has the superhuman handwringing ability and the excuse to hate Detroit. A match made in heaven.