<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boudreau&#039;s Reactions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onfrozenblog.com/2009/01/14/boudreaus-reactions.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onfrozenblog.com/2009/01/14/boudreaus-reactions.html</link>
	<description>A Haven for the Hockey Malnourished</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Xylar77</title>
		<link>http://www.onfrozenblog.com/2009/01/14/boudreaus-reactions.html/comment-page-1#comment-7946</link>
		<dc:creator>Xylar77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mvn.com/onfrozenblog/2009/01/14/boudreaus-reactions.html#comment-7946</guid>
		<description>FAUX...
I don&#039;t suppose you&#039;ve noticed, but instead of being    a cellar-dweller NHL team, The Caps are top-5 in points. When did this turnaround occur...? So do we castigate the guy who has brought nothing but success because we hit a three game losing streak?
To wit:
1)a.when the coach is no longer effective.
b. no
c. I would say that switching to a faster, more O-minded PK is certainly a change. It&#039;s not where it needs to be yet, but it&#039;s gotten us 57 points
2) Players. BB has a system that has been shown to work in 27/44 games. One 3-game losing streak does not an ineffective coach make.
3)The players called themselves out. When that happens, the coach can save his public humiliation tactics for when players don&#039;t &quot;get it.&quot;
4)a. Most people outside of DC (and more than a few in DC in an honest moment) don&#039;t see this Caps team getting a Cup this year. Anything can happen, and that&#039;s why we watch. And cheer. I think it could be considered a good year if we go &quot;deep&quot; in the playoffs.
b. The West has given us problems this year. But if things come together enough for the Caps to get to the finals, I imagine we&#039;d be playing a bit differently at that point. Or, we relive the &#039;98 drubbing we took from Detroit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FAUX&#8230;<br />
I don&#8217;t suppose you&#8217;ve noticed, but instead of being    a cellar-dweller NHL team, The Caps are top-5 in points. When did this turnaround occur&#8230;? So do we castigate the guy who has brought nothing but success because we hit a three game losing streak?<br />
To wit:<br />
1)a.when the coach is no longer effective.<br />
b. no<br />
c. I would say that switching to a faster, more O-minded PK is certainly a change. It&#8217;s not where it needs to be yet, but it&#8217;s gotten us 57 points<br />
2) Players. BB has a system that has been shown to work in 27/44 games. One 3-game losing streak does not an ineffective coach make.<br />
3)The players called themselves out. When that happens, the coach can save his public humiliation tactics for when players don&#8217;t &#8220;get it.&#8221;<br />
4)a. Most people outside of DC (and more than a few in DC in an honest moment) don&#8217;t see this Caps team getting a Cup this year. Anything can happen, and that&#8217;s why we watch. And cheer. I think it could be considered a good year if we go &#8220;deep&#8221; in the playoffs.<br />
b. The West has given us problems this year. But if things come together enough for the Caps to get to the finals, I imagine we&#8217;d be playing a bit differently at that point. Or, we relive the &#8217;98 drubbing we took from Detroit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fauxrumors</title>
		<link>http://www.onfrozenblog.com/2009/01/14/boudreaus-reactions.html/comment-page-1#comment-7945</link>
		<dc:creator>fauxrumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mvn.com/onfrozenblog/2009/01/14/boudreaus-reactions.html#comment-7945</guid>
		<description>1) At what point does the media/fans start to lay some responsibility on the coach?  Should the honeymoon be over?  The PK hasn&#039;t improved since Hanlon, yet the PK strategy hasn&#039;t changed.
2) If the team isn&#039;t ready to compete, as it hasn&#039;t in 3 of their past 4 games who should get the blame?
3)At this &#039;after game conference&#039; he gives reasons for the loss, but gives no indication of what changes he can/will do, or calls out a specific player(s). Who wasn&#039;t &quot;mucking it up&quot; enough?
4) They are now close to healthy, yet does anyone reasonably see this team as a true Cup contender?  Geez, they&#039;d lose to Columbus  if the Jackets made the Finals.  SJ/Detroit/Calgary would be ugly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) At what point does the media/fans start to lay some responsibility on the coach?  Should the honeymoon be over?  The PK hasn&#8217;t improved since Hanlon, yet the PK strategy hasn&#8217;t changed.<br />
2) If the team isn&#8217;t ready to compete, as it hasn&#8217;t in 3 of their past 4 games who should get the blame?<br />
3)At this &#8216;after game conference&#8217; he gives reasons for the loss, but gives no indication of what changes he can/will do, or calls out a specific player(s). Who wasn&#8217;t &#8220;mucking it up&#8221; enough?<br />
4) They are now close to healthy, yet does anyone reasonably see this team as a true Cup contender?  Geez, they&#8217;d lose to Columbus  if the Jackets made the Finals.  SJ/Detroit/Calgary would be ugly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

