On Frozen Blog

A Haven for the Hockey Malnourished

The coldest days best warm my hockey heart


A Day of Dastardly Dichotomy


On this the opening day of '08-09 NHL free agency Washington Capitals' fans confronted the opposing twins of personnel movement outcome: morning elation with Mike Green's signing and afternoon agony in the club's failure to come to terms with season-salvaging, starting netminder Cristobal Huet. The Capitals this afternoon, having reached an impasse with Huet and his agent, signed Colorado's Jose Theodore to a two-year deal.

An absolute bulwark of the Caps' stunning late-season surge to a Southeast division crown, Huet's heroics won't be returning, the fallout of which is this sobering question: have the Caps' Cup contention plans necessarily taken a step back? It's a demoralizing outcome, most particularly in light of widespread reports, from reliable organization sources, that Huet's return was largely a fait accompli.

It would be difficult to imagine a netminder better auditioning for the role of go-to guy, of in-his-prime, no. 1 stud, than Huet's with the Caps this past spring. He went 11-2 in his 13 regular season starts with the Caps, posting two shutouts, a stunning .936 save percentage, and a microscopic 1.63 goals against. Those numbers weren't as impressive in the playoffs against Philadelphia, but after the Caps fell behind three games to one in the series, Huet was rock solid and at times spectacular in net in nearly leading the Caps to a dramatic series comeback.

As for Theodore, this from the Caps' press release:

Theodore, who will turn 32 on Sept. 13, won the Hart Trophy as the NHL’s most valuable player in 2001-02. The 5’11”, 182-pound native of Laval, Quebec, is a 12-year professional who spent the last two seasons with the Colorado Avalanche. He was 28-21-3 with three shutouts, a 2.44 goals-against average and a .910 save percentage in 2007-08, including a 21-13-2 record, a 2.24 GAA and a .919 save percentage in his last 37 starts.

2007-08 was indeed a rebound year for Theodore, but that's also cause for concern for Caps' fans. His has not been a career of model consistency, to put it charitably (he was run out of Montreal). In his previous two seasons, with Montreal and Colorado, Theodore put up sub-.900 save percentages and above 3.00 goals-against numbers. Perhaps more troubling is this: Avalanche Head Coach Joel Quenneville collapsed a trap around him this past season, almost certainly boosting his numbers.  

Disappointment over Huet's departure should not necessarily draw savage criticism of General Manager George McPhee, who was poised today with a viable Plan B. According to the Washington Post's Tarik El Bashir, the Caps met Huet's demands of three years and $5 million per only to learn of his wish to test the proverbial waters, apparently with the Chicago Blackhawks. 

Tonight a stunned HockeyWashington, still in mid-summer swoon over so spectacular a 2007-08 season, has seen the sport's best momentum here in 30-plus years come to a screeching halt.     

Today in D.C. there's palpable disappointment surrounding the personnel outcome for the most important position on the ice. A beautiful bride has run off; left behind is her ok-looking bridesmaid.



Discussion

42 Comments on "A Day of Dastardly Dichotomy"

#1

user-pic

Posted by Gmann, July 1, 2008 5:47 PM

To have demands met in full only to shun them suggests that Huet's wish never was with Washington. More lip service, etc. If JT can stop the puck, it works for this fan....

Reply

#2

user-pic

Posted by Scott, July 1, 2008 5:48 PM

Huet was basically run out of montreal as well...don't forget they gave him away for a 2nd rounder.

Reply

#3

user-pic

Posted by P-Mac, July 1, 2008 5:51 PM

Huet has a history just as shaky as Theodore, without the Hart and Vezina to ease the pain. When the former landed in DC last year, I told friends to be wary. While I was pleasantly surprised -- 14 times, give or take -- Theodore is younger and his new contract is shorter and easier to swallow.

Best keep our eyes out for weak teams in the other divisions, hoping for a wild card, since the Southeast mantra of "win the division or go home" will be tested by a ridiculously retooled Tampa Bay.

Reply

#4

user-pic

Posted by toymechanic, July 1, 2008 5:54 PM

wow....come in off the ledge, it may still work out.

Reply

#5

user-pic

Posted by pucksandbooks, July 1, 2008 5:54 PM

Scott - I couldn't disagree more on Huet with you. His being "run out of town" in Montreal was in no way performance based (as was Theodore's); no, Habs' management wanted their young stud Price to play -- it's that simple. And if you remember back to Habs' fans reactions to the deal, they were none too pleased. And lastly, young Price looked rather young and mortal this past post-season, no?

Reply

#6

user-pic

Posted by OrderedChaos (Mike Rucki), July 1, 2008 5:56 PM

Huet asked for $15/3, the Caps apparently gave it to him, and he still turned it down to hit the market. Huet is simply a hired gun who decided an extra 10% on $5 million was enough to leave D.C after 20 games played.

I'm glad the organization did not bend over for a guy who played so briefly for the Caps -- great games, admittedly, but a rather small sample size. After all, his previous 81 games over two season with Montreal showed a much more pedestrian goalie: 2.65 GAA (that's a full goal per game more than his run with the Caps, over 61 more games) and a .916 save percentage (good, but hardly Vezina-worthy). Huet's run last season & into the first round was a joy; but that $1-ish million saved per year is significant, not to mention that the deal is only 2 years instead of 3.

Keep all this in mind before getting too depressed folks... Theodore's no slouch. Yes, we wanted Huet back, but not if he didn't want to be here.

Reply

#7

user-pic

Posted by Scott, July 1, 2008 5:56 PM

a rediculously retooled tampa bay with olie kolzig as starter.

that really helped the rediculously retooled caps a lot last year...

Reply

#8

user-pic

Posted by Scott, July 1, 2008 6:02 PM

Pucks - I see what you're saying. Still, if management thought he could deliver a cup to the #1 team in the east he would have stayed. All good points above.

Reply

#9

user-pic

Posted by P-Mac, July 1, 2008 6:03 PM

On the one hand, Kolzig may be washed up; on the other, his $1.5 million (?) salary could prove to be a steal. Especially playing in a familiar division against his former team.

Reply

#10

user-pic

Posted by P-Mac, July 1, 2008 6:04 PM

I am not holding my breath for either scenario; but the latter would still make me smile.

Reply

#11

user-pic

Posted by Drew, July 1, 2008 6:06 PM

I've had a few hours to simmer, and I'm reminded of Vogel's well-researched piece Profiling Cup-Winning Goaltenders from February. Synthesizing that report with today's reality, Huet seemed to have the credentials for leading a team like the Caps to a Cup Finals in the very near future, whereas Theodore appears to have already squandered his best years with inconsistency and maladaptation to an improved post-lockout League.

I'm glad GMGM made the best of a situation ultimately forced by, apparently, Huet's greed. Nonetheless, I would posit that we have stepped backwards in our quest for the Cup this coming season or next.

We needed Huet for more than 2 years and IMO we should have offered three as insurance against his looking elsewhere. No one would complain about such largesse if Huet backstopped us to a Finals appearance in the next two seasons. Conservative goalie development is more important than ever, and dictates that the Caps should not entrust the starting slot to Varlamov nor Machesney nor Neuvirth before 2011. If we rush the best of these three into the league -- which certainly seems possible now, if Theodore or Johnson aren't reliable -- then we break with the precedent that seems to have built most reliable, Cup-winning goalies over the past 20 years.

In short, I'm bummed.

Reply

#12

user-pic

Posted by Drew, July 1, 2008 6:09 PM

I meant 3/4 years, not 2/3. Alas.

Reply

#13

user-pic

Posted by GoCapsGo, July 1, 2008 6:23 PM

On the surface, there's not much of a difference between Theodore and Huet, numbers-wise. According to ESPN.com, last season Huet had a 2.32 GAA with a .920 save %. Theodore, in comparison, had a 2.44 GAA with a .910 save %. Not much of a difference here - certainly not enough to warrant an extra $1.2 million per year.

The thing that worries me is the style of play (as a Caps fan living in Denver, I've seen quite a bit of Theodore over the past couple of years). Theodore is pretty solid in his positioning, but he rarely makes the unbelievable, miraculous save. He's solid, but unspectacular.

Huet, on the other hand, strikes me as a more athletic goalie - the type of goalie who is more likely to make the miracle save when his team breaks down in front of him.

Given the inexperience of the Caps' D-men, I'm concerned that Theodore will face quite a few odd-man rushes (like he did here w/ Colorado).

The only silver lining, as I see it, is contract length, in that the Caps won't be hamstrung long term.

Maybe Varlamov will be ready for the big club in 2010?

Reply

#14

user-pic

Posted by pgreene, July 1, 2008 6:30 PM

while i usually agree with the fine folks here at OFB, i don't here. yes, huet had an excellent run down the stretch. of course, so did the team. olie, too, was turning it on as the team started its stretch run, so it's entirely possible huet's perceived greatness was due to team improvement rather than solo ability.

huet has durability issues, which is a problem given what many (not me--i have faith in johnny) believe to be a serious weakness at the backup position. huet was good, but not great, in the playoffs. huet never seemed committed to being a cap long term--between the much-overblown mask issues to the rumors of the wife wanting to go somewhere they spoke french to the "'we want x''ok, done''really? then we want y'" negotiating tactics. all of that, plus what i at least felt were some reasonably shaky goals and a tendency to allow himself to get out of position in order to embellish contact, make me not sad he's on his way to the oh-so-francophone chicago.

then again, even assuming huet was the solution here, which i do not believe he was, how much better is he than theodore? recent numbers suggest that he's just not that much better. if we can get a 7.5 out of 10 for 4.5 for 2 years versus getting an 8 out of 10 for 5.6 for 4, i take the former ever time.

Reply

#15

user-pic

Posted by Scai, July 1, 2008 6:59 PM

I never was a big fan of Huet to begin with. On different levels I've seen his play detoriate once the playoffs roll around. It's been that way in Europe, in Montreal and this season with the Caps. To me he never was a goalie you win a cup with.
All things being equal you'd probably prefer Huet, but when the Huet camp walked away from the offer they had asked for the Caps simply had to act. Unlike Huet Theodore has shown he can win in the playoffs, plus he is cheaper and comes with a shorter term. Definitely better than the next best options, Raycroft, Emery and company.

Reply

#16

user-pic

Posted by PureAgression, July 1, 2008 7:08 PM

The Caps offered Huet the terms he wanted, and then Huet passed on them. I can't fault GMGM for that.

That it's a two year deal tells me two things: 1) The front office thinks that at least one of our 3 goaltending prospects will be NHL-ready a lot sooner than initially expected. Given the history with the likes of Brochu, Charpantier, and Ouellet, that's a very good thing. 2) Cap room, cap room, cap room...when Backstrom and Semin are due for new contracts.

Kudos to GMGM on this one.

Reply

#17

user-pic

Posted by pucksandbooks, July 1, 2008 7:21 PM

I think the two-year deal speaks mad volumes about what Caps' management thinks of Theodore -- namely, that they want rid of him as early as young goalie development allows. What else can be interpreted of a "no.1" netminder, aged 31, getting in terms of term?

We didn't write much about this during the end of the season, out of deference to what was a very very sensitive issue with Kolzig still around, but Caps' defenders, without impugning Kolzig, spoke to us almost in awe of Huet's rebound control, and of knowing where pucks were going off his pads even when he wasn't in control of them. That alone is worth millions of dollars to a hockey organization in an era of parity. I really do believe this played an outsized role in the Caps' winning all seven of their final games to get into the postseason.

Not only have the Caps lost this in losing Huet, they now have to adjust to a third starting netminder in six months -- and one not renowned for his puck control. Or footwork. Or consistency.

If you already aren't, it's time to become religious.

Reply

#18

user-pic

Posted by hockeygrl_76, July 1, 2008 7:41 PM

Ok Well at first I was a little upset about this. I thought for sure that Huet would be here next year but after I thought about it I really don't think this is necessarily bad. Obviously Huet was only after money since the Caps were willing to give him what he wanted and do we really want a guy like that around...not so much. It's so hard to tell with players how they will play when they get here. Look at Feds...he wasn't getting much mention for his hockey skill (lately) but once he got here it was like the fountain of youth. There is still hope. I believe in this team regardless and I think that most of us really knew that Olie, Huet and Johnny were pretty mediocre goalies and we have all been waiting for our young guys to come up. Honestly on this one I think its 6 in one, half dozen in the other...I don't think we're screwed by any means and Theodore may surprise us and regain his previous skill...what upsets ME is the fact that Olie made such a big deal about things over here and then signed with Tampa for so cheap!!! I'm sure George would have been more then happy to give him 3 years for a cheaper price and look it all would have worked out in the end! I still believe if Olie and Huet had wanted to resign Johnny would have been traded. So yeah I'm more upset about the Olie thing and his percieved behavior (since we don't really know what happened behind the scenes) then I am about this situation. It was great damage control by GMGM...

Reply

#19

user-pic

Posted by nadir, July 1, 2008 8:11 PM

As much lip service as Huet's agent gave since the end of the season, you could tell that Huet didn't want to be here. He rarely talked to the media and never talked about staying much.

On the other hand, look at Federov. He says he wants to stay, he does interviews. Other players talked about how he wanted to stay (i.e. Ovechkin numerous times). Add that into the rumors of Huet's wife not liking it here, can't say that I am suprised.

Kind of a bush-league move to say I want this, the Caps say yes, and then he backs out. Pretty much, he can sit on a traffic cone and spin for all I care. McPhee did the right thing here with the cards he was given.

I just feel sorry for all the Huet sweater purchasers. Ouch.

Reply

#20

user-pic

Posted by Drew, July 1, 2008 8:13 PM

There is a huge difference between a .920 and a .910. But considering Huet led the league with a .929 in 2005-06 without winning 20 games, I am comforting myself with the possibility that he's a flash in the pan. I'll also keep reminding myself (whilst crying into my beer for at least ONE happy hour) that Theodore is certainly better than Raycroft, Emery, or whatever else would have been left after today.

Needless to say, $4.5M for a goalie at least YOUNGER and considerably more likely to surprise us than Kolzig ... is a good thing.

Still can't help but be nervous for the inevitable 8-6 games against Tampa next season.

Reply

#21

user-pic

Posted by Flipper, July 1, 2008 8:53 PM

"Tonight a stunned HockeyWashington, still in mid-summer swoon over so spectacular a 2007-08 season, has seen the sport’s best momentum here in 30-plus years come to a screeching halt."

Wow, that's quite a statement there. But I have to disagree with you. Huet leaving affected the momentum very little. Most folks outside of the diehards will likely not even notice there's someone other than Huet on the ice. Both him and Theodore had similar numbers yet Theodore managed to rack up a slightly better save percentage over the course of the entire season on a mediocre team while facing almost 200 more shots than Huet. Seems to me there really isn't much difference other than style, and I'd rather have someone with solid positioning than someone who makes flashy saves...or at least tries to make them.

I'm happy with what Huet did for the team and wish him well with the Blackhawks, but I'm also fine with the Theodore signing. Surprised, yes. Shocked, no. We'll be fine this year. All is not the doom and gloom some folks think it is. Seems like I hear those same sentiments every summer.

Oh, and as for thsoe "inexperienced" D-men, after last year, they're not so inexperienced. If anything, they finally know what it's going to take to get things done.

Reply

#22

user-pic

Posted by b.orr4, July 1, 2008 9:03 PM

I refuse to shed tears over a guy who lied through his teeth about wanting to be here. It's just like marrying somebody who's only doing it because there isn't a better offer available. Maybe his wife really didn't like the city, maybe Huet didn't like Boudreau's system. Hell, maybe he just didn't like the uniforms. Whatever the reason, it's clear now that Huet was only going to sign here as a last resort. It's time to get over it and be thankful we found out before he signed the contract. We just got rid of one unhappy goalie, we don't need a replacement.

Reply

#23

user-pic

Posted by NS2NOVA, July 1, 2008 9:27 PM

It will be interesting to see how the fans in the stands react when the Blackhawks play their first game in the VC.

But the more interesting thing will be the reaction during the 4 games the 'Bolts play.

Reply

#24

user-pic

Posted by Gustafsson, July 1, 2008 9:43 PM

I agree with most of the comments here. Huet got what he asked for, then decided it wasn't good enough and left. Buh bye Huet. Take your lip service elsewhere.

Theodore may not be the same as Huet, but I don't think it's a monumental step down.

It's also interesting to hear GMGM throw out actual salary and term numbers. Has he ever done that even after a failed negotiation?

Interesting to hear him in his press conference this after noon.

Take a listen:
http://capitals.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=PodcastPlayer&pid=41&iid=6334

Reply

#25

user-pic

Posted by Gustafsson, July 1, 2008 9:59 PM

Corey Masisak has some numbers on his blog:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/in-the-room/2008/Jul/01/washingtons-goalie-jose-theodore/:

Here is the goalie comparison from last season for all of the pertinent parties:

2007-08 REGULAR SEASON

Jose Theodore, 28-21-3, 2.44 GAA, .910 save pct.

Cristobal Huet, 32-14-6, 2.32 GAA, .920 save pct.

Olie Kolzig, 25-21-6, 2,91 GAA, .892 save pct.

2007-08 POSTSEASON

Jose Theodore, 4-6, 3.10 GAA, .906 save pct.

Cristobal Huet, 3-4, 2.93 GAA, .909 save pct.

Olie Kolzig, N/A

CAREER REGULAR SEASON

Jose Theodore, 183-197-40, 2.65 GAA, .909 save pct.

Cristobal Huet, 83-61-24, 2.43 GAA, .918 save pct.

Olie Kolzig, 301-293-86, 2.70 GAA, .906 save pct.

CAREER POSTSEASON

Jose Theodore, 19-26, 2.76 GAA, .914 save pct.

Cristobal Huet, 5-8, 2.65 GAA, .919 save pct.

Olie Kolzig, 20-24, 2.14 GAA, .927 save pct.

Reply

#26

user-pic

Posted by TG, July 1, 2008 10:07 PM

I'm trying to talk myself into this signing. I think what may end up making me feel better is that under Coach BB, the team doesn't rely on the goalie to win games, but rather not to lose them (i.e. don't screw it up for everyone else). This isn't like the Devils where the goalie has to be nearly perfect, but rather just good enough to get the job done.

I think Theodore can do that. Or at least, the Theodore from the second half of last season can do that.

And what the heck is Chicago doing? How can they pay Huet that much when they're still paying Khabibulin over $6 million per?

Reply

#27

user-pic

Posted by J.P., July 1, 2008 10:28 PM

@ Gustafsson:

I thought the same thing about the rarity of GMGM's candid discussion on Huet. It's pretty clear from that that he wanted to control the message on how a seemingly sure thing fell apart. That and having Theodore signed almost instantly avoided any potential "these guys aren't committed to winning/no one wants to sign here" backlash. Well played, I'd say.

Oh, and you totally stole my Varlamov/Neuvirth question on the conference call. :)

Reply

#28

user-pic

Posted by b.orr4, July 1, 2008 10:29 PM

It's not hard to read between the lines as to why McPhee released those negotiations details. Part of it is to let Cap fans know that he went the extra mile and it was Huet who walked away. The other reason is to hang Huet's agent out to dry so all the rest of the GMs can see what an untrustworthy low-life he really is.

Reply

#29

user-pic

Posted by Gustafsson, July 1, 2008 10:34 PM

Great minds, J.P.

;-)

I think you and b.orr4 are spot on concerning GMGM throwing out the numbers.

I still never want to play poker with the man.

Reply

#30

user-pic

Posted by mostholy2, July 1, 2008 10:36 PM

I don't think management had any real choice in the matter. You offer what the player wants and he decides to go after more money than what he's originally asking for and for a longer term deal that what you feel is necessary given the developing prospects you have. Kudos to the Caps for keeping their options open and signing the next best goalie on the market.

I just hope that Theodore can keep up his play from the second half of last year and doesn't revert back to the years before last. It's a gamble and may impact the next season if Theodore doesn't keep his top form from last year.

At least we aren't the Avs. They lost Theodore to us and have to now rely on Budaj and Raycroft for goaltending.

It's a shame that Huet decided to go for more money, but you can't blame him. This is most likely the best contract he'll have for the rest of his career. I think that Chicago has a good future with the Kane and Toews, good goaltending with Khabi and Huet, and now they've signed Brian Campbell for a huge contract. Chicago will definitely make the playoffs next year. They just need to hope that these long-term deals don't affect their ability to sign their young stars when contracts come up.

Reply

#31

user-pic

Posted by pepper, July 2, 2008 12:38 AM

Théodore's won two trophies and four playoff series in his career. Huet? Zéro et zéro.

His trajectory also suggests, to me anyway, that he is rounding back into career-best form, in this post-lockout era, rather than falling further away from it.

Don't call it a comeback.

Reply

#32

user-pic

Posted by Ben, July 2, 2008 1:06 AM

I'm not so pessimistic. Theodore really turned it around last season. Yes he bonked in the playoffs - but Colorado was so outmatched defensively Roy himself would have been yanked. Theodore even discussed his turnaround on the conference call- sounds like he has his mojo back. Is he just a contract player? The Caps have the luxury of not having to learn the hard way, committing only 2 years.

I just got a good feeling listening to him. He sounds genuinely motivated and excited to play for the Caps. He lavishly praised our players and organization, going so far as to call DC "the obvious choice." Translation: I want to ride Ovechkin to glory.

I'll take that over the surly dishonesty of the Frenchman any day.

Reply

#33

user-pic

Posted by seb, July 2, 2008 4:58 AM

Count me among the people more concerned about Jose's rebound control.

Huet's ability in that regard really strengthened our D during the stretch run.

Not to mention his ability to play the puck well to his team mates. The difference between him and Kolzig, was a study in contrasts.

There were certainly a couple of Mike "Maradona" Green's runs that he owes to Huet.

Reply

#34

user-pic

Posted by TruIrishRedhead, July 2, 2008 8:18 AM

Intersting point heard this morning - Huet didn't sign here 'cause his wife HATED DC... Don't let the door hit ya Huet!! Let's let Theodore prove to us that his past numbers are in the past - he's working/ has worked with a new goalie guy and improved his game last year... I was on the fence with Huet and he was outstanding for us - and the bugger doesn't want to be here... Theodore seems TRULY excited to come here - make us proud Theo!!!

... I'll still be cheering for Olie in Tampa...

Reply

#35

user-pic

Posted by doughless, July 2, 2008 9:32 AM

you gotta have serious doubts about Theodore. plus, Colorado playing a trap around him. sorry to be a downer, but our D ain't all that. I am trying to remain positive, but without the signing of a solid blueliner I am having trouble remaining so.

Reply

#36

user-pic

Posted by Smitty, July 2, 2008 10:44 AM

Colorado was playing a trap because half of their blueline was injured, not because of a failing on Theodore's part. I'm not saying he's going to be spectacular, but IMHO some of you really need to put the torches and pitchforks away until we've seen him play a few games in a Caps jersey.

Reply

#37

user-pic

Posted by NHL Observer, July 2, 2008 11:05 AM

I'm not as pessimistic about signing Theodore. He could be fine and he's got a better pedigree than Huet at this point, as far as the playoffs are concerned The Caps made a good faith effort to get the deal done with Huet, but they also have other guys to sign. Ultimately, that extra money they saved on Theodore could keep Laich and/or Fedorov, who are also important cogs in the team machine.

Reply

#38

user-pic

Posted by feesh, July 2, 2008 3:32 PM

I think you guys are being a little harsh. Momentum coming to a screeching halt? You guys are starting to sound like the paranoid "fans" who grace us with their pessimism on a daily basis in most of the caps blogs.

Reply

#39

user-pic

Posted by feesh, July 2, 2008 3:35 PM

@pucksandbooks

Until today, this was my favorite blog. This ranting about not signing Huet is ridiculous.

Reply

#40

user-pic

Posted by Nancy, July 2, 2008 6:40 PM

I sent this into Ted's Take because a post there led me here. I agree with you fully and I have found that whenever I send posts into Ted's Take, they are not posted or posted/taken down -- unless they are nice, ted/Caps positive posts. So, perhaps it can live here:


Ted,

I disagree with this based on the description George McPhee gave of the process. The Caps "finally" offered what huet wanted. People overlook that word. And if you follow George McPhee's telling you see how the Caps shot themselves in the foot.

Let's look at it this way, Ted. Say I meet someone and we click and have a great night out and we want to go out on a date to a nice A grade restaurant that costs a high - but agreeable - price for a great Saturday evening out.

Something special's in the air; everyone can see and feel the chemistry (a la the playoff run). The day after our great first meeting, he contacts me:

Him (call #1): Hey, how'd you like to go to dinner at C grade restaurant, Wednesday night? (3.7m/3years)

Me: Um, I'd like to do the A grade restaurant, Saturday night -- and, I know the cost is high, so I'll pay the tip and buy dessert. (5m/3years - even though I'm pretty certain I can get more and for longer.)

Him (call #2): Um, okay: how about we meet halfway: I take you to B grade restaurant, Thursday night, and you pay tip, dessert, wine.

Me:

Him (call #3): Um, hey...been thinking about you. How about the B+ grade restaurant, Friday night, you pay tip/dessert. I'll get the wine, baby.

Me:

Him (call #4): Hey sweetie, let's do A grade restaurant this coming Saturday; the weekend (July 1) is nearing, babe.

Me: buzz off you loser!

I'm sorry, I don't see Huet as greedy on this one. All along everybody knew he was a $5m goalie. He agreed for 3 years and I think if the Caps had said: "what time can you make the press conference" right away instead of "how about we each give 10-15%," we'd not have gotten into this situation in the first place.

As a Caps fan...a premiere season ticket holder, I'm angry that it came down to this.

Nancy

Reply

#41

user-pic

Posted by Nancy, July 3, 2008 1:21 PM

Thanks for leaving this up...I see how now, after it had been posted/pending monitoring and then taken down, my post is in fact back on Ted's Take.

Nancy

Reply

#42

user-pic

Posted by JMoney, July 5, 2008 1:36 AM

Very disappointing on the Huet side because no matter how good your skaters are, you need a shut down keeper between the pipes if you want Lord Stanley's cup. I live in Denver so I see a lot of the Avs, and Theodore is merely a serviceable stopgap (I'm sure George was doing what he could to stop the bleeding). Equally disappointing is the greed of players like Huet because the Caps are starting to look like perennial contenders, why not stay and see what you might achieve? Makes you wonder what kind of team you have to build to attract & keep talent? Probably doesn't matter if the player is a gold digger.

Reply

Leave a comment