On Frozen Blog

A Haven for the Hockey Malnourished

The coldest days best warm my hockey heart


NHL Replay Rules -- Protecting Endangered Zebras


A player crumples to the ice. A referee's arm goes up. Another player protests his innocence. And many times, most of the crowd's reaction is, "What the heck just happened? And why isn't the replay on the big screen?"

Referee Elvis - ChargingDid Player A dive? Did Player B deserve the penalty? Was the ref right on the money or blind as a bat? The speed of the game (and the loftiness of many seats) can make it difficult for fans to see infractions, particularly when the penalty occurs away from the puck. And most times, replays of controversial events are not shown in the arena.

So what replays can be shown on the big screen? At the behest of several recent OFB readers' inquiries (and to satisfy my own curiosity), I sought some clarification from the Capitals.

Unsurprisingly, the NHL scrupulously avoids making its officials look bad, so the league strongly discourages any replays that could cause a crowd to doubt the zebras. The league's strongly-worded policy is clear, as are the fines doled out to teams that violate the policy. While exact amounts were not discussed, I got the impression the fines were significant.

Here, then, is the NHL's rule regarding replays on the big screens during games:

In no event may a play be replayed if the intent or obvious effect of the replay will be to incite the fans or to be critical of the officiating of the game. In particular, close questionable or controversial officiating calls or plays in which no call is made and as to which the crowd reaction is obviously negative, may not be replayed. Although live action is permitted on the video scoreboard, fights and instigating events may not be replayed. The use of footage from the video goal judge replay system is not permitted.

In practice, of course, big-screen replays are sometimes shown very quickly after a given on-ice event--after all, it's a live production. But it's a fine line to straddle, since the league has final say as to whether a given replay shown was "intended" to incite fans or criticize officials--and whether or not to hit the team with a fine.

Most teams, unfortunately but understandably, err on the side of caution to avoid incurring penalties of their own.



Discussion

16 Comments on "NHL Replay Rules -- Protecting Endangered Zebras"

#1

user-pic

Posted by JWJr, March 12, 2008 11:46 AM

Of course, the fans at home get to see _all_ of that, as do live fans of other sports. I can't help but wonder if the quality of officiating doesn't rise when officials are responsible to the live crowd _now_, rather than just to some semi-critical league email received the next morning. -JW

Reply

#2

user-pic

Posted by Victor, March 12, 2008 11:55 AM

This is awesome. Thanks for following up with those who would know!

Reply

#3

user-pic

Posted by OrderedChaos (Mike Rucki), March 12, 2008 11:56 AM

JWJr, good point, but that's a difficult balance to maintain between in-game accountability and giving undue influence to the home crowd. After all, in theory the officials are operating with complete objectivity . . . yes, that's nearly impossible to achieve, but that's the intent. However I completely agree that a mild rebuke from the NHL the next day does nothing to assuage the wronged team and fans.

Reply

#4

user-pic

Posted by Strikeman, March 12, 2008 12:07 PM

I think the not showing replays to the fans is pure crap.

Reply

#5

user-pic

Posted by maruk, March 12, 2008 1:13 PM

At the very least, they should show replays when the video goal judge has to make a call.

Reply

#6

user-pic

Posted by NS2NOVA, March 12, 2008 1:24 PM

I think that if you can't see the video judges replay, then they should at least explain the rational for the call to the fans when the call is finally made.

Reply

#7

user-pic

Posted by b.orr4, March 12, 2008 1:30 PM

Sounds very familiar to the way the Soviet Union used to block news broadcasts from the West. Somehow, its citizens still found ways to discover the truth. If the NHL really thinks this will protect their incompetent refs, their sadly mistaken. We're taking names and checking numbers.

Reply

#8

user-pic

Posted by vt caps fan, March 12, 2008 1:33 PM

JWJr--- not all sports do they show the replays. In the NFL they show replays only when its a questionable call for the home team so that, the Head coach can challenge the call. When its something against the home team, they don't bother showing the replay. But they are asked to refrain from showing it over and over.

In College F'ball they don't show it until the decision has been made by the ref.

Every league has some rule kind of like this. Whether a home team abides by the rule is a different story.

Reply

#9

user-pic

Posted by Kim, March 12, 2008 3:33 PM

I guess there is probably some rationale security/safety reason behind this, but it does seem to take some level of accountability off of the refs.

Is it just me or does it seem like the refs are having "issues" in many games this year. Even when watching teams other than the Caps, it just seems like there are a lot of questionable calls or miscues by the refs.

I know that all sports also have constrainsts on what the coaches and players can say about the officiating. (Which I do not think are necessarily fair). Are there any such restrictions on the media? Just wondering because the Versus guys were pretty vocal about some of the calls in the Buffalo Rangers game.

Reply

#10

user-pic

Posted by SpartyCuse, March 12, 2008 3:36 PM

The rule says fights can not be replayed, but the Blackhawks replay them all the time. Must be a selectively enforced rule.

Reply

#11

user-pic

Posted by melvisdog, March 12, 2008 3:40 PM

This is obviously not a rule adhered to by Philly's video replay crew. Had they followed this policy, Andre Roy would probably be playing hockey this week. http://blogs.tampabay.com/lightning/2008/03/roy-is-sent-hom.html

Just another example of what dirty bastards they are up there.

Reply

#12

user-pic

Posted by OrderedChaos (Mike Rucki), March 12, 2008 4:08 PM

I didn't know about the Blackhawks' fight replay frequency, but I know Philly does it sometimes. They've been fined by the league before, and likely will be fined again for the Tampa incident.

Reply

#13

user-pic

Posted by Norm, March 12, 2008 5:26 PM

Thanks for looking into this, I was probably the biggest recent whiner.

I think Ted should lobby to have this changed - I don't think there is a compelling "safety" issue. In the NFL, the replays frequently show the refs were accurate.

Reply

#14

user-pic

Posted by Grooven, March 12, 2008 11:09 PM

I'm not saying it justifies it, but one of the concerns regarding the showing of replays is that when fans are riled up, drinks, burritos etc become projectiles endangering anyone on the ice surface. I know I know -- who would do such a thing? And yet...

In football (as an example for comparison) the field is much larger and much farther away from even the nearest fans. And there's not too much hazard stepping on a beer cup while wearing cleats.

Reply

#15

user-pic

Posted by Victor, March 13, 2008 8:17 AM

You may or may not be surprised but -- even at MCI/Verizon -- there've been some games where the refs have requested (and been granted) an escort to their cars/cabs after games when the fans have been particularly verbal. It's possible they may have done so last night, because you have to admit the fans were getting on the refs hard during the second period.

Reply

#16

user-pic

Posted by dave, March 14, 2008 11:36 AM

I never knew this! Great job getting the information.

Reply

Leave a comment