(Incidentally, TSN has a useful Marleau stats page. With respect to imagining him as AO’s man in the middle, I really liked reading this synopsis of Marleau: “blessed with great speed and can catch defenders off guard by blazing right by them. Has natural goal-scoring ability . . .”)

Why would the Caps potentially be interested in addressing their conspicuous need for a first-line center via a trade, such as one perhaps for Marleau? For starters, the entire ‘A’ list of free agent pivots is regularly pegged as landing in the usual suspect cities. It’s a bit of Catch-22 dilemma for the Caps: until Washington can establish itself as a year-in, year-out playoff contender, most if not all the elite free agents are likely to bypass the rebuilding Caps. Problem is, they need a couple of high-profile horses like Marleau to get them there.

Marleau’s pricetag is also appealing — in his contract year, a good $3 million shy of what the elite UFA centers are likely to fetch this summer. Admittedly it’d be a risk moving significant assets for a guy who might dress for you just one year and walk, but remember the salary cap flexibility George McPhee will need next summer, when a certain set of Russian left wings will need new deals, as will the captain and potentially the no.1 netminder.

I have no idea if the Sharks will move Marleau. I just recall that after a string of 100-point seasons, and a few 90-pt. ones in between, each followed by early playoff exits, then Caps’ GM David Poile did the unthinkable and moved Mike Gartner to try and shake things up. What would it likely cost the Caps to land Marleau? You have to think this year’s no. 5 pick, and a prime asset, like say Fleischmann or Mike Green. And even that might not get it done.

Quality costs quality, you know.

  • BallHype - Hype It Up!
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Google
  • Facebook
  • Pownce
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Wikio
  • del.icio.us
  • TwitThis
  • E-mail this story to a friend!


Print This Post Print This Post
Posted at 4:23 pm. Filed under NHL Trades, National Hockey League, San Jose Sharks, Washington Capitals.
Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments here with the RSS feed. Post a comment or leave a trackback.
Server Swap
Back to the Calder Cup Future: Bears 3, Monarchs 1

8 Comments

  1. Nomad wrote:

    It seems like a lot of the discussion hinges on Marleau’s contract expiring after 08-09. Unfortunately, that isn’t the case - he hits his UFA status on July 1, 2008 so you are looking at one year of Marleau in trade and a contract that comes due at the same time that Ovechkin and Semin are due their raises.

    Saturday, May 26, 2007 at 6:40 pm | Permalink
  2. Nomad wrote:

    My apologies, upon rereading, I see you account for the one year contract (by saying that he be here for one year and walk) - the 2008-2009 line was very confusing.

    Saturday, May 26, 2007 at 6:45 pm | Permalink
  3. Wthrw wrote:

    I don’t know; Marleau would certainly improve the team, but man, that’s a lot to give up for a guy who’s going to be able to walk at the end of the year. I think I’d rather have Green or Fleischmann and whoever gets picked 5th overall for multiple years than Marleau for just one year, especially considering where we are the rebuilding process. If we do make this kind of trade this summer, I’d hope it’d be for something that fits a little better into the long-term plan.

    Saturday, May 26, 2007 at 10:00 pm | Permalink
  4. Chimaera wrote:

    If you can get it done for those two pieces, you do it in a second in my opinion.

    I think it would cost more…
    I’d go upwards of 3 prime parts for him, though I think San Jose will be looking for established talent as they are very deep in young talent.

    Saturday, May 26, 2007 at 10:41 pm | Permalink
  5. pepper wrote:

    Its somewhat painful for me to say, because Hanlon has been a good coach for a team who was (until hopefully this season), below the level of real NHL contention, but if it were possible to bring back Wilson, man, I’d be on that bandwagon.

    How can a Caps fan truly not love the guy, and not at least think about his return if he’s available?

    Saturday, May 26, 2007 at 11:20 pm | Permalink
  6. pucksandbooks wrote:

    Remember guys, just because a guy has a year left on his deal doesn’t mean ipso facto he walks at the end of it. What if a Marleau or his ilk came here and really dug the town and the room? There have been plenty of guys in that position who’ve re-upped. But it’s a risk, no denying.

    Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 12:32 am | Permalink
  7. TG wrote:

    Well, it would fill one of the big holes, and leave room in the salary cap for the primo defenseman they need. I think that unless they’re asking for the moon, you’ve got to do it. Otherwise, what’s the point of acquiring all those assets if you never turn them into something good! Baby steps, baby steps…

    Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 1:56 pm | Permalink
  8. Doug wrote:

    I think the Caps need to substantially improve next year or risk losing Ovechkin. I don’t think it’s a case of money; he will get maximum dollars. He does not like to lose. Marleau, if only for a year, would certainly be welcome. Question is — what would San Jose ask in return? It may be time to roll the dice and take a chance.

    Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 8:36 pm | Permalink

One Trackback/Pingback

  1. On Frozen Blog | The Flea Market Opens on Wednesday, June 13, 2007 at 6:42 am

    [...] Likely we won’t see a blockbuster like last June’s Panthers’ dealing of Roberto Luongo (for junk; and we may not see such lopsidedness again in this lifetime). Then again, we may see Patrick Marleau moved. The game within the game taking place now through next Friday night involves the leagues GMs sorting through their UFA and RFA lists, comparing last season’s payroll with ‘07-’08’s projected cap, and charting a course for correction and improvement. For some clubs, payroll will be pared and some prime players moved. For others (the Caps), payroll will increase, assets added. A fair bit of this correction will take place over the course of the next 10 days. [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*

*



By clicking "Submit" you agree that you have read and will abide by the Comment Policy.