Het was goed om naar hockey na de slechte smaak en de controverse van de voordien nacht terug te gaan, maar het resultaat was geen volledige verrassing. It’s a tough stretch for the Caps, but the playoff-contending pack in the Eastern conference hasn’t really had anybody who has taken advantage of other clubs’ misfortunes. If the Caps can ride out the storm, squirreling away a point here or there, then they may be poised for a move when the shcedule provides more breathing room and they get healthy. Getting a point here or there is proving to be as difficult as originally thought, however.

  • BallHype - Hype It Up!
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Google
  • Facebook
  • Pownce
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Wikio
  • del.icio.us
  • TwitThis
  • E-mail this story to a friend!


Print This Post Print This Post
Posted at 10:43 am. Filed under Knee-Jerk, Montreal Canadiens, Washington Capitals.
Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments here with the RSS feed. Post a comment or leave a trackback.

6 Comments

  1. “Steve Eminger’s play continues to slowly and quietly progress. I scratched my head at the sight of a blast from the slot that Huet gloved, and wondered who had taken the shot. To my surprise it was Eminger, who also logged a lot of ice-time.”

    I 100% agree. Eminger’s play has progressed nicely. I really like his game.
    I guess I am jealous. The Caps are such a fun team to watch…lots of grit,and hustle. Lucky you. They may lose but rarely is the effort not there.

    I always look forward to games in Washington.

    Thursday, December 28, 2006 at 3:00 pm | Permalink
  2. CapsChick wrote:

    I’m so glad I’m not the only one who thought Eminger had a good game last night and has been playing better lately. After a very slow start, it’s nice to see Steve beginning to play like we need him to. Still a little ways to go before he’s a genuine top 4 d-man, but improvement is always good.

    Thursday, December 28, 2006 at 3:14 pm | Permalink
  3. pepper wrote:

    I agree on the potential, or lack thereof, of a line 2 sans Semin as a scoring threat. Pettinger-Gordon/Beech-Clark doesn’t get it done. I understand the desire to punch in a goal with a top line of the two Alexs when behind, but long-term this is no way to throw out lines.

    We got schooled big-time on faceoffs lastnight. No easy fix for that.

    And while Montreal is formidable on defense, and while the Caps are an overworked and understaffed bunch right now, we’re back to our anemic power play ways. So frustrating to watch. I’m not going to take solace in a 6 on 3 goal.

    Les Habs were a defensive juggernaut last night. It was amazing how well they were positioned, to a man, around the net. No amount of effort on our part could get any good angle for a shot on Huet.

    Finally, I was surprised at how little of an effect Brash’s pummeling of Downey had on the team. That was his best fight all year, I thought, and it didn’t seem to provide any spark at all.

    Thursday, December 28, 2006 at 3:56 pm | Permalink
  4. pepper wrote:

    Now I recall that was actually a 5 on 3 goal. Anyway, too little too late.

    Thursday, December 28, 2006 at 4:01 pm | Permalink
  5. usiel wrote:

    Take away that Downey flukish goal and the screw up the ref did with uber fast whistle and it could have been a different game. Habs had been off for a few days and came to play. It was going to be a really tough one for the caps to pull off. Kolzig had a very strong game.

    Thursday, December 28, 2006 at 4:12 pm | Permalink
  6. Capsaholic wrote:

    More on Eminger:
    Hopefully, one day we’ll be able to put him with a good “stay at home” partner because I believe he has some decent offensive potential. I would like to see him sneak up in the offensive zone again.

    Thursday, December 28, 2006 at 9:51 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*

*



By clicking "Submit" you agree that you have read and will abide by the Comment Policy.