On Frozen Blog

A Haven for the Hockey Malnourished

The coldest days best warm my hockey heart


The Psychology of Shootout Success . . . and Suckitude


When Matt Pettinger bears down on a goalie in breakaway fashion, quite often he's money. But this season, like all of Caps' his teammates, he fires blanks in shootouts.

With Alexander Ovechkin, forget about breakaways -- when he's on his patented bullrush on the wing, even with an able defender between him and the goalie, you can almost see the netminder's white knuckles through his glove. And yet we've fairly reached the point of expecting his failure in shootouts.

This hockey team, which positively feasted on the shootout a year ago, has been mystifyingly stymied by them in '06-'07. In four shootouts thus far, they haven't potted a single tally. It's reached the point where Joe Reekie might be recruited out of the broadcast booth for the next OT-ender.

All the odder in light of the personnel picking up the puck at center ice this season: wheareas last year Coach Hanlon relied on AO and then shooter by committee (Brooks Laich, Brian Willsie, Matt Pettinger, Dainius Zubrus), this season he seemingly has a sturdy set of snipers in AO, Alex Semin, and Pettinger. So what gives?
rages-olie.jpg

BallHype: hype it up!


Discussion

2 Comments on "The Psychology of Shootout Success . . . and Suckitude"

#1

user-pic

Posted by pepper, November 17, 2006 4:06 AM

Throw Gordo out there!

Just kidding (maybe).

This comment could reference back the science of hockey article earlier posted on this fine blog, but clearly, to me, a principal difference between the breakaway during a game and a shootout attempt is (i) the shooter himself feels a sense of urgency in-game (defense is bearing down, time of game, opportunity to settle the puck for a shot, whatever) and (ii) the goalie has some in-game distractions in the form of other players in peripheral vision, specifically the potential for some passing play.

More "soft" science, I'd say a guy like Petty gets more pumped to score a regulation breakaway goal than a shootout goal, because of the drama (and maybe perhaps because, until now, North American players don't grow up dreaming of scoring a shootout goal to win a game, rather one more like a Dale Hunter OT game winner). Shootouts are scripted in a sense, whereas the in-game breakaway is so exciting because it develops immediately without advance notice.

I agree a shootout specialist exists and takes a unique skill set. Specifically someone who has good hands, but can't show it off as well with time pressure and traffic.

Reply

#2

user-pic

Posted by Mmmm...Toasty, November 17, 2006 3:11 PM

With the new NHL point structure, the extra point from shootout wins will ultimately make the difference between an early tee time and playing beyond the middle of April. Shootout success is essential in the new NHL. Where would Buffalo be in the Eastern Conference standings without a 4-1 shootout record?

Reply

Leave a comment